The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pain-related distress and clinical depression in chronic pain: A comparison between two measures

Pain-related distress and clinical depression in chronic pain: A comparison between two measures
Pain-related distress and clinical depression in chronic pain: A comparison between two measures
Background and purposeDepression is a frequent co-morbid diagnosis in chronic pain, and has been shown to predict poor outcome. Several reviews have described the difficulty in accurate and appropriate measurement of depression in pain patients, and have proposed a distinction between pain-related distress and clinical depression. Aims of the current study were to compare (a) the overlap and differential categorisation of pain patients as depressed, and (b) the relationship to disability between the Structured Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-Depression module) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).MethodsSeventy-eight chronic back pain patients were administered the SCID-D, the HADS-D and the Pain Disability Index (PDI).ResultsSignificantly more patients were categorised with possible and probable depression by the HADS than the SCID-D. Results from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis suggested that the HADS-D provided better discriminatory ability to detect disability, demonstrating a better balance between sensitivity and specificity compared to the SCID-D, although a direct comparison between the two measurements showed no difference.ConclusionsThe HADS-D is a reasonably accurate indicator of pain-related distress in chronic pain patients, and captures the link between disability and mood.ImplicationsIt is likely that the SCID-D is better suited to identifying sub-groups with more pronounced psychiatric disturbance.PerspectiveSeveral reviews have proposed a distinction between pain-related distress and clinical depression. This study compared the overlap and differential categorisation of pain patients as depressed and the relationship to disability between the Structured Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-D; Depression module) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).
62-67
Rusu, Adina C.
b36cc834-21f5-4462-ab39-4b6eb5a7a8a2
Santos, Rita
567ec108-91f6-4d44-9d78-9229819a6732
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Rusu, Adina C.
b36cc834-21f5-4462-ab39-4b6eb5a7a8a2
Santos, Rita
567ec108-91f6-4d44-9d78-9229819a6732
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c

Rusu, Adina C., Santos, Rita and Pincus, Tamar (2016) Pain-related distress and clinical depression in chronic pain: A comparison between two measures. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 12 (1), 62-67. (doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.04.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and purposeDepression is a frequent co-morbid diagnosis in chronic pain, and has been shown to predict poor outcome. Several reviews have described the difficulty in accurate and appropriate measurement of depression in pain patients, and have proposed a distinction between pain-related distress and clinical depression. Aims of the current study were to compare (a) the overlap and differential categorisation of pain patients as depressed, and (b) the relationship to disability between the Structured Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-Depression module) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).MethodsSeventy-eight chronic back pain patients were administered the SCID-D, the HADS-D and the Pain Disability Index (PDI).ResultsSignificantly more patients were categorised with possible and probable depression by the HADS than the SCID-D. Results from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis suggested that the HADS-D provided better discriminatory ability to detect disability, demonstrating a better balance between sensitivity and specificity compared to the SCID-D, although a direct comparison between the two measurements showed no difference.ConclusionsThe HADS-D is a reasonably accurate indicator of pain-related distress in chronic pain patients, and captures the link between disability and mood.ImplicationsIt is likely that the SCID-D is better suited to identifying sub-groups with more pronounced psychiatric disturbance.PerspectiveSeveral reviews have proposed a distinction between pain-related distress and clinical depression. This study compared the overlap and differential categorisation of pain patients as depressed and the relationship to disability between the Structured Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-D; Depression module) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 July 2016
Additional Information: © 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469495
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469495
PURE UUID: b1745e2e-4718-4f15-a61a-7774f9dca3e9
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2022 16:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adina C. Rusu
Author: Rita Santos
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×