The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The acceptability of testing contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases using serial, self-administered lateral flow devices as an alternative to self-isolation

The acceptability of testing contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases using serial, self-administered lateral flow devices as an alternative to self-isolation
The acceptability of testing contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases using serial, self-administered lateral flow devices as an alternative to self-isolation
Introduction: evidence suggests that although people modify their behaviours, full adherence to self-isolation guidance in England may be suboptimal, which may have a detrimental impact on COVID-19 transmission rates.

Hypothesis: testing asymptomatic contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 could reduce onward transmission by improving case ascertainment and lessen the impact of self-isolation on un-infected individuals.

Aim: this study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a ‘test to enable approach’ as part of England’s tracing strategy.

Methodology: contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases were offered serial testing as an alternative to self-isolation using daily self-performed lateral flow device (LFD) tests for the first 7 days post-exposure. Asymptomatic participants with a negative LFD result were given 24 h of freedom from self-isolation between each test. A self-collected confirmatory PCR test was performed on testing positive or at the end of the LFD testing period.

Results: of 1760 contacts, 882 consented to daily testing, of whom 812 individuals were within 48 h of exposure and were sent LFD testing packs. Of those who declined to participate, 39.1% stated they had already accessed PCR testing. Of the 812 who were sent LFD packs, 570 (70.2%) reported one or more LFD results; 102 (17.9%) tested positive. Concordance between reported LFD result and a supplied LFD image was 97.1%. In total, 82.8% of PCR-positive samples and 99.6% of PCR-negative samples were correctly detected by LFD. The proportion of secondary cases from contacts of those who participated in the study and tested positive (6.3%; 95% CI: 3.4–11.1%) was comparable to a comparator group who self-isolated (7.6%; 95% CI: 7.3–7.8%).

Conclusion: this study shows a high acceptability, compliance and positivity rates when using self-administered LFDs among contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases. Offering routine testing as a structured part of the contact tracing process is likely to be an effective method of case ascertainment.
COVID-19, DCT, SARS-CoV-2 and testing, contacts, lateral flow testing
0022-2615
Love, Nicola
f3f4f2aa-af53-4062-91e0-21b798a72f3e
Ready, Derren
bc11ef15-b8f9-4372-9750-fd9c55981796
Turner, Charlie
2d50607d-3fdf-4859-8c63-592c51d02395
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Rubin, G.J.
4776cfa7-0040-48af-8b8d-f644ae7c27ec
Hopkins, Susan
b029cd66-2cdd-469b-9404-90294a360ec9
Oliver, Isabel
8cd29c59-d46a-4b7f-97ee-ad66a48cf0ff
Love, Nicola
f3f4f2aa-af53-4062-91e0-21b798a72f3e
Ready, Derren
bc11ef15-b8f9-4372-9750-fd9c55981796
Turner, Charlie
2d50607d-3fdf-4859-8c63-592c51d02395
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Rubin, G.J.
4776cfa7-0040-48af-8b8d-f644ae7c27ec
Hopkins, Susan
b029cd66-2cdd-469b-9404-90294a360ec9
Oliver, Isabel
8cd29c59-d46a-4b7f-97ee-ad66a48cf0ff

Love, Nicola, Ready, Derren, Turner, Charlie, Yardley, Lucy, Rubin, G.J., Hopkins, Susan and Oliver, Isabel (2022) The acceptability of testing contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases using serial, self-administered lateral flow devices as an alternative to self-isolation. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 71 (8), [001567]. (doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001567).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: evidence suggests that although people modify their behaviours, full adherence to self-isolation guidance in England may be suboptimal, which may have a detrimental impact on COVID-19 transmission rates.

Hypothesis: testing asymptomatic contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 could reduce onward transmission by improving case ascertainment and lessen the impact of self-isolation on un-infected individuals.

Aim: this study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a ‘test to enable approach’ as part of England’s tracing strategy.

Methodology: contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases were offered serial testing as an alternative to self-isolation using daily self-performed lateral flow device (LFD) tests for the first 7 days post-exposure. Asymptomatic participants with a negative LFD result were given 24 h of freedom from self-isolation between each test. A self-collected confirmatory PCR test was performed on testing positive or at the end of the LFD testing period.

Results: of 1760 contacts, 882 consented to daily testing, of whom 812 individuals were within 48 h of exposure and were sent LFD testing packs. Of those who declined to participate, 39.1% stated they had already accessed PCR testing. Of the 812 who were sent LFD packs, 570 (70.2%) reported one or more LFD results; 102 (17.9%) tested positive. Concordance between reported LFD result and a supplied LFD image was 97.1%. In total, 82.8% of PCR-positive samples and 99.6% of PCR-negative samples were correctly detected by LFD. The proportion of secondary cases from contacts of those who participated in the study and tested positive (6.3%; 95% CI: 3.4–11.1%) was comparable to a comparator group who self-isolated (7.6%; 95% CI: 7.3–7.8%).

Conclusion: this study shows a high acceptability, compliance and positivity rates when using self-administered LFDs among contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases. Offering routine testing as a structured part of the contact tracing process is likely to be an effective method of case ascertainment.

Text
jmm001567 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 May 2022
Published date: 10 August 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: D.R. and I.O. acknowledge support from the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at University of Bristol. S.H. is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency [UKHSA; formerly Public Health England (PHE)]. LFDs were provided by the Department of Health and Social Care.
Keywords: COVID-19, DCT, SARS-CoV-2 and testing, contacts, lateral flow testing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469548
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469548
ISSN: 0022-2615
PURE UUID: ca3342f8-d1ed-4466-bd84-b49bd015c7e1
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Sep 2022 16:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicola Love
Author: Derren Ready
Author: Charlie Turner
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: G.J. Rubin
Author: Susan Hopkins
Author: Isabel Oliver

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×