Documenting Electronic Texts: Panel discussion
Documenting Electronic Texts: Panel discussion
While it is estimated that there are thousands of electronic texts all over the world, there is generally no standardized bibliographic control. If electronic texts were cataloged according to accepted standards, duplication could be avoided, and their use encouraged more effectively.
The Rutgers Inventory of Machine-Readable Texts in the Humanities is now maintained by CETH, the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities, and uses the standard AACR2 [Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (2nd Ed, 1988)]. The RLINMARC program is used to hold the data in MDF (computer files) format.
The file header described by the proposals (P2) of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) incorporates all the information needed to follow the rules of AARC2 as well as other information now often lacking. In particular, proper cataloging can indicate the degree of availability of a text, so where there is uncertainty about copyright questions, an entry could still indicate to the serious scholar whether a copy of the text is available or not.
SGML, Metadata creation
Hoogcarspel, Annelies
2af94bf1-3634-434e-a8cf-a2aa223c3b01
Giordano, Richard
13c61925-de2b-48ae-beab-6aedac3ed14c
Burnard, Lou
1261d2db-fd54-4390-aa4f-79a465f61fda
17 June 1993
Hoogcarspel, Annelies
2af94bf1-3634-434e-a8cf-a2aa223c3b01
Giordano, Richard
13c61925-de2b-48ae-beab-6aedac3ed14c
Burnard, Lou
1261d2db-fd54-4390-aa4f-79a465f61fda
Hoogcarspel, Annelies, Giordano, Richard and Burnard, Lou
(1993)
Documenting Electronic Texts: Panel discussion.
Annual Meeting of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computing in the Humanities, Georgetown University, Washington, United States.
15 - 19 Jun 1993.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Other)
Abstract
While it is estimated that there are thousands of electronic texts all over the world, there is generally no standardized bibliographic control. If electronic texts were cataloged according to accepted standards, duplication could be avoided, and their use encouraged more effectively.
The Rutgers Inventory of Machine-Readable Texts in the Humanities is now maintained by CETH, the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities, and uses the standard AACR2 [Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (2nd Ed, 1988)]. The RLINMARC program is used to hold the data in MDF (computer files) format.
The file header described by the proposals (P2) of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) incorporates all the information needed to follow the rules of AARC2 as well as other information now often lacking. In particular, proper cataloging can indicate the degree of availability of a text, so where there is uncertainty about copyright questions, an entry could still indicate to the serious scholar whether a copy of the text is available or not.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 17 June 1993
Venue - Dates:
Annual Meeting of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computing in the Humanities, Georgetown University, Washington, United States, 1993-06-15 - 1993-06-19
Keywords:
SGML, Metadata creation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469640
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469640
PURE UUID: 081456b4-4c92-4ebc-9cb0-8f4480774068
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Sep 2022 16:58
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:48
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Annelies Hoogcarspel
Author:
Lou Burnard
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics