The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Carl Schmitt, sovereignty, modernism

Carl Schmitt, sovereignty, modernism
Carl Schmitt, sovereignty, modernism
Carl Schmitt has recently become a popular figure in humanities scholarship. In this turn, contemporary culture has amplified Schmitt’s insights about sovereignty, states of emergency and political decisions. His ideas have particularly disturbed and excited literary theorists, who use his writings as a methodological resource for approaching 21st century literary fiction. This type of critical work does not fully take into account Schmitt’s own encounters with, and exercises in, literature, art and cultural criticism. Concomitantly, nor does it understand his relationship to the literary cultures of his time and the artistic context within which he wrote his major philosophical works. In Europe and America, Schmitt’s life as a writer, stretching from the 1910s to the 1970s, is dominated by the aesthetic revolution of modernism. Using this framing, my thesis asks: Does Schmitt’s concept of sovereignty— of ‘he who decides on the exception’—transform understandings of modernism? If so, how does this transformation attend to genres, forms and styles in ways that answer questions about sovereignty? How is sovereignty depicted in modernist literature? In response, this thesis analyses three works by definitive authors of literary modernism: Virginia Woolf’s Orlando (1928), William Faulkner’s The Wild Palms (1939) and Samuel Beckett’s “Ping” (1967). It argues that these fictions respond to questions of sovereignty through their deployment of various, ironic aesthetic and representational techniques. Woolf’s mocking satire of melancholy ironizes sovereign authority as epoch-defining. Faulkner’s genresplicing, contrapuntal novel identifies failure as a contingent response to absolute sovereignty. Beckett’s prose short explores the relationship between anticipation and the human search for sovereign representation. The methods I am exercising in this thesis speak within continuing and ever more complicated debates about sovereignty.
University of Southampton
Owen, Joseph
d724f7d7-6df1-4f2b-9bdf-ac73398a9196
Owen, Joseph
d724f7d7-6df1-4f2b-9bdf-ac73398a9196
Jones, Stephanie
19fbdd53-fdd0-43ad-9203-7462e5f658c6
Hayden, Sarah
cf6b5dc1-acda-4983-83e6-ad2d96e73764

Owen, Joseph (2021) Carl Schmitt, sovereignty, modernism. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 271pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Carl Schmitt has recently become a popular figure in humanities scholarship. In this turn, contemporary culture has amplified Schmitt’s insights about sovereignty, states of emergency and political decisions. His ideas have particularly disturbed and excited literary theorists, who use his writings as a methodological resource for approaching 21st century literary fiction. This type of critical work does not fully take into account Schmitt’s own encounters with, and exercises in, literature, art and cultural criticism. Concomitantly, nor does it understand his relationship to the literary cultures of his time and the artistic context within which he wrote his major philosophical works. In Europe and America, Schmitt’s life as a writer, stretching from the 1910s to the 1970s, is dominated by the aesthetic revolution of modernism. Using this framing, my thesis asks: Does Schmitt’s concept of sovereignty— of ‘he who decides on the exception’—transform understandings of modernism? If so, how does this transformation attend to genres, forms and styles in ways that answer questions about sovereignty? How is sovereignty depicted in modernist literature? In response, this thesis analyses three works by definitive authors of literary modernism: Virginia Woolf’s Orlando (1928), William Faulkner’s The Wild Palms (1939) and Samuel Beckett’s “Ping” (1967). It argues that these fictions respond to questions of sovereignty through their deployment of various, ironic aesthetic and representational techniques. Woolf’s mocking satire of melancholy ironizes sovereign authority as epoch-defining. Faulkner’s genresplicing, contrapuntal novel identifies failure as a contingent response to absolute sovereignty. Beckett’s prose short explores the relationship between anticipation and the human search for sovereign representation. The methods I am exercising in this thesis speak within continuing and ever more complicated debates about sovereignty.

Text
Joseph Owen PhD-thesis - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (5MB)
Text
Joseph Owen Permission to deposit thesis signed
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: July 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469713
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469713
PURE UUID: 5fdd67f8-8ea5-4302-9397-12e7f89956c0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Sep 2022 16:48
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 22:16

Export record

Contributors

Author: Joseph Owen
Thesis advisor: Stephanie Jones
Thesis advisor: Sarah Hayden

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×