The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Waveform-based microseismic location using stochastic optimization algorithms: A parameter tuning workflow

Waveform-based microseismic location using stochastic optimization algorithms: A parameter tuning workflow
Waveform-based microseismic location using stochastic optimization algorithms: A parameter tuning workflow
A fast and accurate source location estimation is the foundation for passive seismic processing and interpretation. Waveform-based location methods become more and more popular for analysis of both natural and induced seismicity. We utilize stochastic optimization algorithms to speed up microseismic location. Two waveform-based location methods (i.e. diffraction stacking and cross correlation stacking) are adopted to test the performance of three algorithms (i.e. particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and neighbourhood algorithm). In order to enhance the algorithmic performance, we propose a parameter tuning workflow which consists of two types of repeated tests. One type is multiple independent tests for a single event and the other involves tests of multiple events. The success rate, speedup, location uncertainty and bias are investigated to assess the algorithmic performances. We apply the workflow to a field dataset of mining induced seismicity and obtain preferential algorithm(s) with optimized ranges of control parameters. Synthetic tests are also conducted to demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed parameter tuning workflow. Given the two imaging operators, differential evolution is demonstrated to be the preferential one accounting for both algorithmic robustness and efficiency. Meanwhile, the workflow also examines the characteristics of different imaging operators. Cross correlation stacking proves to be simpler and more robust than its counterpart. Though the workflow is developed for microseismic location, it can also be adapted for other seismic inversion problems (e.g., source mechanism inversion) and ensure the algorithmic robustness and efficiency.
Data processing, Algorithms, Geophysics, Inverse problems
0098-3004
115-127
Li, Lei
26ee89c4-b986-4454-bab1-1155284a9fb8
Tan, Jingqiang
8fd56cdd-77c8-46f2-96a0-43edab272118
Xie, Yujiang
77c46c7b-1aa6-4534-bca1-8c6a3dd40705
Tan, Yuyang
eb311f48-9227-4525-a30c-dfe5e9c892e3
Walda, Jan
5cdcaa89-d037-4737-8312-3846eafafc22
Zhao, Zhengguang
cde60b80-68e0-4a20-828d-3f2e4740317b
Gajewski, Dirk
9e5050b8-d167-48bc-8784-921b84e87ca0
Li, Lei
26ee89c4-b986-4454-bab1-1155284a9fb8
Tan, Jingqiang
8fd56cdd-77c8-46f2-96a0-43edab272118
Xie, Yujiang
77c46c7b-1aa6-4534-bca1-8c6a3dd40705
Tan, Yuyang
eb311f48-9227-4525-a30c-dfe5e9c892e3
Walda, Jan
5cdcaa89-d037-4737-8312-3846eafafc22
Zhao, Zhengguang
cde60b80-68e0-4a20-828d-3f2e4740317b
Gajewski, Dirk
9e5050b8-d167-48bc-8784-921b84e87ca0

Li, Lei, Tan, Jingqiang, Xie, Yujiang, Tan, Yuyang, Walda, Jan, Zhao, Zhengguang and Gajewski, Dirk (2019) Waveform-based microseismic location using stochastic optimization algorithms: A parameter tuning workflow. Computers & Geosciences, 124, 115-127. (doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2019.01.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A fast and accurate source location estimation is the foundation for passive seismic processing and interpretation. Waveform-based location methods become more and more popular for analysis of both natural and induced seismicity. We utilize stochastic optimization algorithms to speed up microseismic location. Two waveform-based location methods (i.e. diffraction stacking and cross correlation stacking) are adopted to test the performance of three algorithms (i.e. particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and neighbourhood algorithm). In order to enhance the algorithmic performance, we propose a parameter tuning workflow which consists of two types of repeated tests. One type is multiple independent tests for a single event and the other involves tests of multiple events. The success rate, speedup, location uncertainty and bias are investigated to assess the algorithmic performances. We apply the workflow to a field dataset of mining induced seismicity and obtain preferential algorithm(s) with optimized ranges of control parameters. Synthetic tests are also conducted to demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed parameter tuning workflow. Given the two imaging operators, differential evolution is demonstrated to be the preferential one accounting for both algorithmic robustness and efficiency. Meanwhile, the workflow also examines the characteristics of different imaging operators. Cross correlation stacking proves to be simpler and more robust than its counterpart. Though the workflow is developed for microseismic location, it can also be adapted for other seismic inversion problems (e.g., source mechanism inversion) and ensure the algorithmic robustness and efficiency.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 March 2019
Additional Information: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Data processing, Algorithms, Geophysics, Inverse problems

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469853
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469853
ISSN: 0098-3004
PURE UUID: deb3c960-c23c-4735-afcd-0b85f80088b4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Sep 2022 16:39
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lei Li
Author: Jingqiang Tan
Author: Yujiang Xie
Author: Yuyang Tan
Author: Jan Walda
Author: Zhengguang Zhao
Author: Dirk Gajewski

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×