A systematic review of movement monitoring devices to aid the prediction of pressure ulcers in at-risk adults
A systematic review of movement monitoring devices to aid the prediction of pressure ulcers in at-risk adults
The present study sought to explore the impact of movement monitoring devices on risk prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers (PU) among adults. Using systematic review methodology, we included original research studies using a prospective design, written in English, assessing adult patients' movement in bed, using a movement monitoring device. The search was conducted in March 2021, using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases, and returned 1537 records, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool and quality appraisal was undertaken using the evidence-based librarianship (EBL). In total, 19 different movement monitoring devices were used in the studies, using a range of physical sensing principles. The studies focused on quantifying the number and types of movements. In four studies the authors compared the monitoring system with PU risk assessment tools, with a variety of high and low correlations observed. Four studies compared the relationship between movement magnitude and frequency and the development of PUs, with variability in results also identified. Two of these studies showed, as expected, that those who made less movements developed more PU; however, the two studies also unexpectedly found that PUs occurred in both low movers and high movers. In the final two studies, the authors focused on the concordance with recommended repositioning based on the results of the monitoring device. Overall, concordance with repositioning increased with the use of a monitoring device. The synthesis of the literature surrounding bed monitoring technologies for PU risk prediction showed that a range of physical sensors can be used to detect the frequency of movement. Clinical studies showed some correlation between parameters of movement and PU risk/incidence, although the heterogeneity of approaches limits generalisable recommendations.
mobility, movement, pressure ulcer, prevention, risk assessment
Moore, Zena
be24f9db-758c-43bf-8d69-8ecbe7bd38f3
Avsar, Pinar
d610d8ec-7fb0-49cc-b96e-976b533490b8
O'Connor, Tom
ca4b93ea-3603-4ef6-95bd-596591ca6df2
Budri, Aglecia
e4b72fc9-460e-491b-a8df-abe151889be0
Bader, Dan L
06079726-5aa3-49cd-ad71-402ab4cd3255
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Caggiari, Silvia
5ec3fb71-9706-4394-8ea3-495a5f01e3ee
Patton, Declan
14028238-82a2-4af2-ab3b-6fa272703c56
30 July 2022
Moore, Zena
be24f9db-758c-43bf-8d69-8ecbe7bd38f3
Avsar, Pinar
d610d8ec-7fb0-49cc-b96e-976b533490b8
O'Connor, Tom
ca4b93ea-3603-4ef6-95bd-596591ca6df2
Budri, Aglecia
e4b72fc9-460e-491b-a8df-abe151889be0
Bader, Dan L
06079726-5aa3-49cd-ad71-402ab4cd3255
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Caggiari, Silvia
5ec3fb71-9706-4394-8ea3-495a5f01e3ee
Patton, Declan
14028238-82a2-4af2-ab3b-6fa272703c56
Moore, Zena, Avsar, Pinar, O'Connor, Tom, Budri, Aglecia, Bader, Dan L, Worsley, Peter, Caggiari, Silvia and Patton, Declan
(2022)
A systematic review of movement monitoring devices to aid the prediction of pressure ulcers in at-risk adults.
International Wound Journal.
(doi:10.1111/iwj.13902).
Abstract
The present study sought to explore the impact of movement monitoring devices on risk prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers (PU) among adults. Using systematic review methodology, we included original research studies using a prospective design, written in English, assessing adult patients' movement in bed, using a movement monitoring device. The search was conducted in March 2021, using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases, and returned 1537 records, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool and quality appraisal was undertaken using the evidence-based librarianship (EBL). In total, 19 different movement monitoring devices were used in the studies, using a range of physical sensing principles. The studies focused on quantifying the number and types of movements. In four studies the authors compared the monitoring system with PU risk assessment tools, with a variety of high and low correlations observed. Four studies compared the relationship between movement magnitude and frequency and the development of PUs, with variability in results also identified. Two of these studies showed, as expected, that those who made less movements developed more PU; however, the two studies also unexpectedly found that PUs occurred in both low movers and high movers. In the final two studies, the authors focused on the concordance with recommended repositioning based on the results of the monitoring device. Overall, concordance with repositioning increased with the use of a monitoring device. The synthesis of the literature surrounding bed monitoring technologies for PU risk prediction showed that a range of physical sensors can be used to detect the frequency of movement. Clinical studies showed some correlation between parameters of movement and PU risk/incidence, although the heterogeneity of approaches limits generalisable recommendations.
Text
International Wound Journal - 2022 - Moore - A systematic review of movement monitoring devices to aid the prediction of
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 5 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 July 2022
Published date: 30 July 2022
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords:
mobility, movement, pressure ulcer, prevention, risk assessment
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469878
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469878
ISSN: 1742-4801
PURE UUID: e3b072e1-1ed4-4493-91eb-eca45caed7ba
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Sep 2022 17:12
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Zena Moore
Author:
Pinar Avsar
Author:
Tom O'Connor
Author:
Aglecia Budri
Author:
Dan L Bader
Author:
Silvia Caggiari
Author:
Declan Patton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics