Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice
Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice
The choice of open versus closed innovation is shaped by the interplay between firms' analytical orientation and the institutional conditions within firms' operating environments. Whereas there is a plethora of research about the antecedents of innovation performance, there is a lack of understanding about the factors affecting and influencing innovation governance. Regulatory, normative, and cognitive institutional voids have differential impacts on the choice of open versus closed innovation. Firms' analytical orientation, political connections, and collaborating partners' home country institutions moderate the effect of institutional voids on innovation governance.
57-66
Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele
984123fb-f587-4d3a-b331-70af28aed8cb
Peprah, Augustine Awuah
bae898c9-95d3-4010-966a-f06785f645fb
Eyong, Joseph Ebot
5d8f0737-a994-4788-ac98-2139fc5ef4dc
Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele
984123fb-f587-4d3a-b331-70af28aed8cb
Peprah, Augustine Awuah
bae898c9-95d3-4010-966a-f06785f645fb
Eyong, Joseph Ebot
5d8f0737-a994-4788-ac98-2139fc5ef4dc
Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele, Peprah, Augustine Awuah and Eyong, Joseph Ebot
(2020)
Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice.
Strategic Change, 29 (1), .
(doi:10.1002/jsc.2310).
Abstract
The choice of open versus closed innovation is shaped by the interplay between firms' analytical orientation and the institutional conditions within firms' operating environments. Whereas there is a plethora of research about the antecedents of innovation performance, there is a lack of understanding about the factors affecting and influencing innovation governance. Regulatory, normative, and cognitive institutional voids have differential impacts on the choice of open versus closed innovation. Firms' analytical orientation, political connections, and collaborating partners' home country institutions moderate the effect of institutional voids on innovation governance.
Text
Institutional Voids and Innovation Governance A Conceptual Exposition of the Open versus Closed Architecture Choice (002)
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Strategic Change - 2020 - Liedong - Institutional voids and innovation governance A conceptual exposition of the open
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 January 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469974
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469974
ISSN: 1086-1718
PURE UUID: 46c71e6c-425a-44a3-884e-1aa9e3376ed4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Sep 2022 16:43
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tahiru Azaaviele Liedong
Author:
Augustine Awuah Peprah
Author:
Joseph Ebot Eyong
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics