The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice

Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice
Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice
The choice of open versus closed innovation is shaped by the interplay between firms' analytical orientation and the institutional conditions within firms' operating environments. Whereas there is a plethora of research about the antecedents of innovation performance, there is a lack of understanding about the factors affecting and influencing innovation governance. Regulatory, normative, and cognitive institutional voids have differential impacts on the choice of open versus closed innovation. Firms' analytical orientation, political connections, and collaborating partners' home country institutions moderate the effect of institutional voids on innovation governance.
1086-1718
57-66
Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele
984123fb-f587-4d3a-b331-70af28aed8cb
Peprah, Augustine Awuah
bae898c9-95d3-4010-966a-f06785f645fb
Eyong, Joseph Ebot
5d8f0737-a994-4788-ac98-2139fc5ef4dc
Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele
984123fb-f587-4d3a-b331-70af28aed8cb
Peprah, Augustine Awuah
bae898c9-95d3-4010-966a-f06785f645fb
Eyong, Joseph Ebot
5d8f0737-a994-4788-ac98-2139fc5ef4dc

Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele, Peprah, Augustine Awuah and Eyong, Joseph Ebot (2020) Institutional voids and innovation governance: A conceptual exposition of the open versus closed architecture choice. Strategic Change, 29 (1), 57-66. (doi:10.1002/jsc.2310).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The choice of open versus closed innovation is shaped by the interplay between firms' analytical orientation and the institutional conditions within firms' operating environments. Whereas there is a plethora of research about the antecedents of innovation performance, there is a lack of understanding about the factors affecting and influencing innovation governance. Regulatory, normative, and cognitive institutional voids have differential impacts on the choice of open versus closed innovation. Firms' analytical orientation, political connections, and collaborating partners' home country institutions moderate the effect of institutional voids on innovation governance.

Text
Institutional Voids and Innovation Governance A Conceptual Exposition of the Open versus Closed Architecture Choice (002) - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Strategic Change - 2020 - Liedong - Institutional voids and innovation governance A conceptual exposition of the open - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 January 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469974
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469974
ISSN: 1086-1718
PURE UUID: 46c71e6c-425a-44a3-884e-1aa9e3376ed4
ORCID for Augustine Awuah Peprah: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-9161

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Sep 2022 16:43
Last modified: 30 Oct 2023 03:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tahiru Azaaviele Liedong
Author: Augustine Awuah Peprah ORCID iD
Author: Joseph Ebot Eyong

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×