The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

“We ought to eat in order to work, not vice versa”: MacIntyre, practices, and the best work for humankind

“We ought to eat in order to work, not vice versa”: MacIntyre, practices, and the best work for humankind
“We ought to eat in order to work, not vice versa”: MacIntyre, practices, and the best work for humankind
This paper draws a distinction between ‘right MacIntyreans’ who are relatively optimistic that MacIntyre’s vision of ethics can be realised in capitalist society, and ‘left MacIntyreans’ who are sceptical about this possibility, and aims to show that the ‘left MacIntyrean’ position is a promising perspective available to business ethicists. It does so by arguing for a distinction between ‘community-focused’ practices and ‘excellence-focused’ practices. The latter concept fulfils the promise of practices to provide us with an understanding of the best work for humankind and highlights the affinities between MacIntyre’s concept of a practice and Marx’s conception of good work as free, creative activity. The paper concludes with a suggestion that we reflect on the best forms of work so that we can strive to ensure the very best activities, those most consonant with our flourishing, one day become available to all.
0167-4544
263-274
Sinnicks, Matthew
63b27aef-8672-4fa7-b2fa-388c9af51c57
Sinnicks, Matthew
63b27aef-8672-4fa7-b2fa-388c9af51c57

Sinnicks, Matthew (2021) “We ought to eat in order to work, not vice versa”: MacIntyre, practices, and the best work for humankind. Journal of Business Ethics, 174 (2), 263-274. (doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04603-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper draws a distinction between ‘right MacIntyreans’ who are relatively optimistic that MacIntyre’s vision of ethics can be realised in capitalist society, and ‘left MacIntyreans’ who are sceptical about this possibility, and aims to show that the ‘left MacIntyrean’ position is a promising perspective available to business ethicists. It does so by arguing for a distinction between ‘community-focused’ practices and ‘excellence-focused’ practices. The latter concept fulfils the promise of practices to provide us with an understanding of the best work for humankind and highlights the affinities between MacIntyre’s concept of a practice and Marx’s conception of good work as free, creative activity. The paper concludes with a suggestion that we reflect on the best forms of work so that we can strive to ensure the very best activities, those most consonant with our flourishing, one day become available to all.

Text
s10551-020-04603-4 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (703kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 August 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 August 2020
Published date: November 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470060
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470060
ISSN: 0167-4544
PURE UUID: 0629483c-cd15-465e-bacf-eba35df8f095
ORCID for Matthew Sinnicks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-5821

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Sep 2022 17:15
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Matthew Sinnicks ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×