The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

In defence of wish lists: business ethics, professional ethics, and ordinary morality

In defence of wish lists: business ethics, professional ethics, and ordinary morality
In defence of wish lists: business ethics, professional ethics, and ordinary morality
Business ethics is often understood as a variety of professional ethics, and thus
distinct from ordinary morality in an important way. This article seeks to challenge two ways of defending this claim: first, from the nature of business practice, and second, from the contribution of business. The former argument fails because it undermines our ability to rule out a professional-ethics approach to a number of disreputable practices. The latter argument fails because the contribution of business is extrinsic to business in a way that distinguishes from the established professions. The article ultimately suggests we adopt a more aspirational approach to business ethics, which retains an appeal even in the face of charges of anti-capitalist irrelevance.
business ethics, professional ethics, role ethics
0277-2027
79-107
Sinnicks, Matthew
63b27aef-8672-4fa7-b2fa-388c9af51c57
Sinnicks, Matthew
63b27aef-8672-4fa7-b2fa-388c9af51c57

Sinnicks, Matthew (2023) In defence of wish lists: business ethics, professional ethics, and ordinary morality. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 42 (1), 79-107. (doi:10.5840/bpej202347137).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Business ethics is often understood as a variety of professional ethics, and thus
distinct from ordinary morality in an important way. This article seeks to challenge two ways of defending this claim: first, from the nature of business practice, and second, from the contribution of business. The former argument fails because it undermines our ability to rule out a professional-ethics approach to a number of disreputable practices. The latter argument fails because the contribution of business is extrinsic to business in a way that distinguishes from the established professions. The article ultimately suggests we adopt a more aspirational approach to business ethics, which retains an appeal even in the face of charges of anti-capitalist irrelevance.

Text
Sinnicks - forthcoming - In Defence of Wishlists (AM) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (263kB)
Text
Sinnicks - 2023 - Wish lists - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 October 2021
Published date: 20 April 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: I would like to thank Craig Reeves, Holly Smith, and two anonymous reviewers for BPEJ for comments on previous versions of this paper.
Keywords: business ethics, professional ethics, role ethics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470074
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470074
ISSN: 0277-2027
PURE UUID: 770ffe0e-3045-40ab-83fe-c6c1526120f4
ORCID for Matthew Sinnicks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-5821

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Oct 2022 16:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Matthew Sinnicks ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×