The elusive digital/critical synthesis
The elusive digital/critical synthesis
In the first edition of Debates in the Digital Humanities, Alan Liu argued that digital humanists risk losing a seat at the “table of debate” if they continue to emphasize tools and databases to the exclusion of cultural criticism. Digital humanists, Liu wrote, must learn to “move seamlessly between text analysis and cultural analysis” if they are not to become a service industry to the humanities, providing tools and data for other scholars but not contributing to key debates. Not long afterward, the expression “hacking and yacking” emerged as another iteration of the difference between cultural critique and tool- and data-centric research. In 2014, Bethany Nowviskie tried to put the expression to rest, noting that the digital humanities has plenty of room for both hacking and yacking (“On the Origin”). Roopika Risam has likewise expressed optimism about “transcending” the “simplistic hack/yack binary.” The field continues to seem optimistic about the compatibility of digital methods and cultural criticism. Liu’s challenge is being met
University of Minnesota Press
Long, Seth
3768f8e9-d611-4ea4-b432-569a16630d1b
Baker, James
96e66490-0844-46eb-bc81-fbbc6bf38692
2019
Long, Seth
3768f8e9-d611-4ea4-b432-569a16630d1b
Baker, James
96e66490-0844-46eb-bc81-fbbc6bf38692
Long, Seth and Baker, James
(2019)
The elusive digital/critical synthesis.
In,
Gold, Matthew K. and F. Klein, Lauren
(eds.)
Debates in Digital Humanities 2019.
(Debates in the digital humanities)
University of Minnesota Press.
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In the first edition of Debates in the Digital Humanities, Alan Liu argued that digital humanists risk losing a seat at the “table of debate” if they continue to emphasize tools and databases to the exclusion of cultural criticism. Digital humanists, Liu wrote, must learn to “move seamlessly between text analysis and cultural analysis” if they are not to become a service industry to the humanities, providing tools and data for other scholars but not contributing to key debates. Not long afterward, the expression “hacking and yacking” emerged as another iteration of the difference between cultural critique and tool- and data-centric research. In 2014, Bethany Nowviskie tried to put the expression to rest, noting that the digital humanities has plenty of room for both hacking and yacking (“On the Origin”). Roopika Risam has likewise expressed optimism about “transcending” the “simplistic hack/yack binary.” The field continues to seem optimistic about the compatibility of digital methods and cultural criticism. Liu’s challenge is being met
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 470119
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470119
PURE UUID: cf674781-8d6c-40bc-92fe-b9d0181865f1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Oct 2022 16:56
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:07
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Seth Long
Editor:
Matthew K. Gold
Editor:
Lauren F. Klein
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics