The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Algal turf sediments and sediment production by parrotfishes across the continental shelf of the Northern Great Barrier Reef

Algal turf sediments and sediment production by parrotfishes across the continental shelf of the Northern Great Barrier Reef
Algal turf sediments and sediment production by parrotfishes across the continental shelf of the Northern Great Barrier Reef
Sediments are found in the epilithic algal matrix (EAM) of all coral reefs and play important roles in ecological processes. Although we have some understanding of patterns of EAM sediments across individual reefs, our knowledge of patterns across broader spatial scales is limited. We used an underwater vacuum sampler to quantify patterns in two of the most ecologically relevant factors of EAM sediments across the Great Barrier Reef: total load and grain size distribution. We compare these patterns with rates of sediment production and reworking by parrotfishes to gain insights into the potential contribution of parrotfishes to EAM sediments. Inner-shelf reef EAMs had the highest sediment loads with a mean of 864.1 g m-2, compared to 126.8 g m-2 and 287.4 g m-2 on mid- and outer-shelf reefs, respectively. High sediment loads were expected on inner-shelf reefs due to their proximity to the mainland, however, terrigenous siliceous sediments only accounted for 13–24% of total mass. On inner-shelf reef crests parrotfishes would take three months to produce the equivalent mass of sediment found in the EAM. On the outer-shelf it would take just three days, suggesting that inner-shelf EAMs are characterised by low rates of sediment turnover. By contrast, on-reef sediment production by parrotfishes is high on outer-shelf crests. However, exposure to oceanic swells means that much of this production is likely to be lost. Hydrodynamic activity also appears to structure sediment patterns at within-reef scales, with coarser sediments (> 250 μm) typifying exposed reef crest EAMs, and finer sediments (< 250 μm) typifying sheltered back-reef EAMs. As both the load and grain size of EAM sediments mediate a number of important ecological processes on coral reefs, the observed sediment gradients are likely to play a key role in the structure and function of the associated coral reef communities.
1932-6203
Tebbett, Sterling B
cdb96273-f8e9-4213-af08-1740215e4b37
Goatley, Christopher Harry Robert
b158dc1a-76f3-4ace-9d33-260d8c76ac93
Bellwood, David R
829e5839-9ac7-4f63-961c-8d0bf8caab8a
Tebbett, Sterling B
cdb96273-f8e9-4213-af08-1740215e4b37
Goatley, Christopher Harry Robert
b158dc1a-76f3-4ace-9d33-260d8c76ac93
Bellwood, David R
829e5839-9ac7-4f63-961c-8d0bf8caab8a

Tebbett, Sterling B, Goatley, Christopher Harry Robert and Bellwood, David R (2017) Algal turf sediments and sediment production by parrotfishes across the continental shelf of the Northern Great Barrier Reef. PLoS ONE, 12 (1), [e0170845]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170854).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Sediments are found in the epilithic algal matrix (EAM) of all coral reefs and play important roles in ecological processes. Although we have some understanding of patterns of EAM sediments across individual reefs, our knowledge of patterns across broader spatial scales is limited. We used an underwater vacuum sampler to quantify patterns in two of the most ecologically relevant factors of EAM sediments across the Great Barrier Reef: total load and grain size distribution. We compare these patterns with rates of sediment production and reworking by parrotfishes to gain insights into the potential contribution of parrotfishes to EAM sediments. Inner-shelf reef EAMs had the highest sediment loads with a mean of 864.1 g m-2, compared to 126.8 g m-2 and 287.4 g m-2 on mid- and outer-shelf reefs, respectively. High sediment loads were expected on inner-shelf reefs due to their proximity to the mainland, however, terrigenous siliceous sediments only accounted for 13–24% of total mass. On inner-shelf reef crests parrotfishes would take three months to produce the equivalent mass of sediment found in the EAM. On the outer-shelf it would take just three days, suggesting that inner-shelf EAMs are characterised by low rates of sediment turnover. By contrast, on-reef sediment production by parrotfishes is high on outer-shelf crests. However, exposure to oceanic swells means that much of this production is likely to be lost. Hydrodynamic activity also appears to structure sediment patterns at within-reef scales, with coarser sediments (> 250 μm) typifying exposed reef crest EAMs, and finer sediments (< 250 μm) typifying sheltered back-reef EAMs. As both the load and grain size of EAM sediments mediate a number of important ecological processes on coral reefs, the observed sediment gradients are likely to play a key role in the structure and function of the associated coral reef communities.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 25 January 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470218
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470218
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 0a03d579-a883-432d-9e45-0b4462ded2e8
ORCID for Christopher Harry Robert Goatley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-5591

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Oct 2022 16:50
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sterling B Tebbett
Author: Christopher Harry Robert Goatley ORCID iD
Author: David R Bellwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×