Algal turf sediments limit the spatial extent of function delivery on coral reefs
Algal turf sediments limit the spatial extent of function delivery on coral reefs
The presence of key organisms is frequently associated with the delivery of specific ecosystem functions. Areas with such organisms are therefore often considered to have greater levels of these functions. While this assumption has been the backbone of coral reef ecosystem-based management approaches for decades, we currently have only a limited understanding of how fish presence equates to function on coral reefs and whether this relationship is susceptible to stressors. To assess the capacity of a stressor to shape function delivery we used a multi-scale approach ranging from tens of kilometres across the continental shelf of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, down to centimetres within a reef habitat. At each scale, we quantified the spatial extent of a model function (detritivory) by a coral reef surgeonfish (Ctenochaetus striatus) and its potential to be shaped by sediments. At broad spatial scales, C. striatus presence was correlated strongly with algal turf sediment loads, while at smaller spatial scales, function delivery appears to be constrained by algal turf sediment distributions. In all cases, sediment loads above ~250–500 g m−2 were associated with a marked decrease in fish abundance or feeding activity, suggesting that a common ecological threshold lies within this range. Our results reveal a complex functional dynamic between proximate agents of function delivery (fish) and the ultimate drivers of function delivery (sediments), which emphasizes: a) weaknesses in the assumed links between fish presence and function, and b) the multi-scale capacity of algal turf sediments to shape reef processes. Unless direct extractive activities (e.g. fishing) are the main driver of function loss on coral reefs, managing to conserve fish abundance is unlikely to yield the desired outcomes. It only addresses one potential driver. Instead, management of both the agents that deliver functions (e.g. fishes), and the drivers that modify functions (e.g. sediments), is needed.
Tebbett, Sterling B
cdb96273-f8e9-4213-af08-1740215e4b37
Goatley, Christopher Harry Robert
b158dc1a-76f3-4ace-9d33-260d8c76ac93
Streit, Robert P
1e4681ab-19d4-4f13-8929-19617e26cd38
Bellwood, David R
829e5839-9ac7-4f63-961c-8d0bf8caab8a
10 September 2020
Tebbett, Sterling B
cdb96273-f8e9-4213-af08-1740215e4b37
Goatley, Christopher Harry Robert
b158dc1a-76f3-4ace-9d33-260d8c76ac93
Streit, Robert P
1e4681ab-19d4-4f13-8929-19617e26cd38
Bellwood, David R
829e5839-9ac7-4f63-961c-8d0bf8caab8a
Tebbett, Sterling B, Goatley, Christopher Harry Robert, Streit, Robert P and Bellwood, David R
(2020)
Algal turf sediments limit the spatial extent of function delivery on coral reefs.
Science of the Total Environment, 734, [139422].
(doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139422).
Abstract
The presence of key organisms is frequently associated with the delivery of specific ecosystem functions. Areas with such organisms are therefore often considered to have greater levels of these functions. While this assumption has been the backbone of coral reef ecosystem-based management approaches for decades, we currently have only a limited understanding of how fish presence equates to function on coral reefs and whether this relationship is susceptible to stressors. To assess the capacity of a stressor to shape function delivery we used a multi-scale approach ranging from tens of kilometres across the continental shelf of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, down to centimetres within a reef habitat. At each scale, we quantified the spatial extent of a model function (detritivory) by a coral reef surgeonfish (Ctenochaetus striatus) and its potential to be shaped by sediments. At broad spatial scales, C. striatus presence was correlated strongly with algal turf sediment loads, while at smaller spatial scales, function delivery appears to be constrained by algal turf sediment distributions. In all cases, sediment loads above ~250–500 g m−2 were associated with a marked decrease in fish abundance or feeding activity, suggesting that a common ecological threshold lies within this range. Our results reveal a complex functional dynamic between proximate agents of function delivery (fish) and the ultimate drivers of function delivery (sediments), which emphasizes: a) weaknesses in the assumed links between fish presence and function, and b) the multi-scale capacity of algal turf sediments to shape reef processes. Unless direct extractive activities (e.g. fishing) are the main driver of function loss on coral reefs, managing to conserve fish abundance is unlikely to yield the desired outcomes. It only addresses one potential driver. Instead, management of both the agents that deliver functions (e.g. fishes), and the drivers that modify functions (e.g. sediments), is needed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 10 September 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 470317
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470317
ISSN: 0048-9697
PURE UUID: 8c097330-c04f-41f9-a262-d1c475198da7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Oct 2022 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sterling B Tebbett
Author:
Christopher Harry Robert Goatley
Author:
Robert P Streit
Author:
David R Bellwood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics