“Ties that bind”: The continued conflation of sex, sexuality and gender
“Ties that bind”: The continued conflation of sex, sexuality and gender
Few in the humanities and social sciences will doubt the long-standing historical conflation of sex, sexuality and gender both within and without academia. Despite research and socio-political movements aiming for the contrary, it continues even now. This paper discusses the ongoing conflation between these interrelated but independent social categories in current linguistic research, including how it can serve to reflect and reinforce socio-political antagonism outside of academia. I propose two potential directions of travel: (1) welcoming ideological pluralism between scholars on the primacy of either sex, gender or sexuality; and (2) horizontally disaggregating the three categories. I argue that engaging with both strategies in tandem serves to benefit researchers, participants and the public. The former encourages trust in academic research during a time wherein that trust is waning. The latter enables an analytical distinction between sex, gender, and sexuality in linguistic research, whilst continuing to acknowledge their interrelatedness. Implemented together, they will allow researchers to embed research in the 21st century, which entails pluralistic and competing socio-political activism between equally deserving groups.
63-70
Webster, Lexi
73920a7c-4aac-4188-81fb-b604c1dac45c
Webster, Lexi
73920a7c-4aac-4188-81fb-b604c1dac45c
Webster, Lexi
(2021)
“Ties that bind”: The continued conflation of sex, sexuality and gender.
Journal of Language and Sexuality, 10 (1), .
(doi:10.1075/jls.00015.web).
Abstract
Few in the humanities and social sciences will doubt the long-standing historical conflation of sex, sexuality and gender both within and without academia. Despite research and socio-political movements aiming for the contrary, it continues even now. This paper discusses the ongoing conflation between these interrelated but independent social categories in current linguistic research, including how it can serve to reflect and reinforce socio-political antagonism outside of academia. I propose two potential directions of travel: (1) welcoming ideological pluralism between scholars on the primacy of either sex, gender or sexuality; and (2) horizontally disaggregating the three categories. I argue that engaging with both strategies in tandem serves to benefit researchers, participants and the public. The former encourages trust in academic research during a time wherein that trust is waning. The latter enables an analytical distinction between sex, gender, and sexuality in linguistic research, whilst continuing to acknowledge their interrelatedness. Implemented together, they will allow researchers to embed research in the 21st century, which entails pluralistic and competing socio-political activism between equally deserving groups.
Text
[WEBSTER, L] Ties That Bind - Journal of Language and Sexuality
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 February 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 470401
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470401
ISSN: 2211-3770
PURE UUID: cb4b4dff-c6fb-40fb-ad75-d8d843701ba9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Oct 2022 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lexi Webster
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics