Sensory feedback for upper-limb prostheses: opportunities and barriers
Sensory feedback for upper-limb prostheses: opportunities and barriers
The addition of sensory feedback to upper-limb prostheses has been shown to improve control, increase embodiment, and reduce phantom limb pain. However, most commercial prostheses do not incorporate sensory feedback due to several factors. This paper focuses on the major challenges of a lack of deep understanding of user needs, the unavailability of tailored, realistic outcome measures and the segregation between research on control and sensory feedback. The use of methods such as the Person-Based Approach and co-creation can improve the design and testing process. Stronger collaboration between researchers can integrate different prostheses research areas to accelerate the translation process.
Control, embodiment, phantom limb pain, prostheses, sensory feedback, translation, user needs
738-747
Jabban, Leen
484d9d9d-4d42-4f40-8ad4-be6044dde8e0
Dupan, Sigrid
69bddf68-7ea4-41d4-acb7-83d940c02f15
Zhang, Dingguo
b7c636b8-c59b-4e74-810b-792847e8d398
Ainsworth, Ben
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Nazarpour, Kianoush
2b734f9e-91d5-4875-964b-204169571987
Metcalfe, Benjamin
33fce643-9066-453f-a0ce-8d0b7e7a7772
2022
Jabban, Leen
484d9d9d-4d42-4f40-8ad4-be6044dde8e0
Dupan, Sigrid
69bddf68-7ea4-41d4-acb7-83d940c02f15
Zhang, Dingguo
b7c636b8-c59b-4e74-810b-792847e8d398
Ainsworth, Ben
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Nazarpour, Kianoush
2b734f9e-91d5-4875-964b-204169571987
Metcalfe, Benjamin
33fce643-9066-453f-a0ce-8d0b7e7a7772
Jabban, Leen, Dupan, Sigrid, Zhang, Dingguo, Ainsworth, Ben, Nazarpour, Kianoush and Metcalfe, Benjamin
(2022)
Sensory feedback for upper-limb prostheses: opportunities and barriers.
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 30, .
(doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3159186).
Abstract
The addition of sensory feedback to upper-limb prostheses has been shown to improve control, increase embodiment, and reduce phantom limb pain. However, most commercial prostheses do not incorporate sensory feedback due to several factors. This paper focuses on the major challenges of a lack of deep understanding of user needs, the unavailability of tailored, realistic outcome measures and the segregation between research on control and sensory feedback. The use of methods such as the Person-Based Approach and co-creation can improve the design and testing process. Stronger collaboration between researchers can integrate different prostheses research areas to accelerate the translation process.
Text
Sensory_Feedback_for_Upper-Limb_Prostheses_Opportunities_and_Barriers
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 March 2022
Published date: 2022
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
The work of Kianoush Nazarpour was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), U.K., under Grant EP/R004242/2.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2001-2011 IEEE.
Keywords:
Control, embodiment, phantom limb pain, prostheses, sensory feedback, translation, user needs
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 470452
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470452
ISSN: 1534-4320
PURE UUID: f8fa5b63-5dcc-4df2-9bdd-bee68fd7d88e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Oct 2022 16:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Leen Jabban
Author:
Sigrid Dupan
Author:
Dingguo Zhang
Author:
Ben Ainsworth
Author:
Kianoush Nazarpour
Author:
Benjamin Metcalfe
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics