The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Welfare implications of switching to consumption taxation

Welfare implications of switching to consumption taxation
Welfare implications of switching to consumption taxation
We evaluate a reform of the US tax system switching to consumption taxation instead of income taxation. We do so in an environment that allows for progressivity of consumption taxes through differential tax rates between basic and non-basic consumption goods. The consumption tax system that maximizes aggregate welfare involves a 4% subsidy on basic consumption goods and a 68% tax on non-basic goods. Such a tax scheme generates 10% higher output in the long run, with a small increase in inequality. Nonetheless, the benchmark with progressive income taxes and mild consumption taxes provides higher welfare on aggregate in the steady state, and even more so if we consider the transition.
0165-1889
Conesa, Juan Carlos
ee9698bc-c247-448b-b3aa-d80be1681021
Li, Bo
966a37e5-b59a-44a1-8ea5-fa137b06df90
Li, Qian
e8950786-8f13-45ac-9a4d-8942268fe32c
Conesa, Juan Carlos
ee9698bc-c247-448b-b3aa-d80be1681021
Li, Bo
966a37e5-b59a-44a1-8ea5-fa137b06df90
Li, Qian
e8950786-8f13-45ac-9a4d-8942268fe32c

Conesa, Juan Carlos, Li, Bo and Li, Qian (2020) Welfare implications of switching to consumption taxation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 120, [103991]. (doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103991).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We evaluate a reform of the US tax system switching to consumption taxation instead of income taxation. We do so in an environment that allows for progressivity of consumption taxes through differential tax rates between basic and non-basic consumption goods. The consumption tax system that maximizes aggregate welfare involves a 4% subsidy on basic consumption goods and a 68% tax on non-basic goods. Such a tax scheme generates 10% higher output in the long run, with a small increase in inequality. Nonetheless, the benchmark with progressive income taxes and mild consumption taxes provides higher welfare on aggregate in the steady state, and even more so if we consider the transition.

Text
1-s2.0-S0165188920301597-main (1) - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Conesa_Li_Li2020JEDC - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 September 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 October 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470510
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470510
ISSN: 0165-1889
PURE UUID: 398a1135-5805-4b3c-a269-ffca79fa5e12

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Oct 2022 16:35
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 22:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Juan Carlos Conesa
Author: Bo Li
Author: Qian Li

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×