Is there a limit to resemblances? Teaching about science and pseudoscience from a family resemblance perspective
Is there a limit to resemblances? Teaching about science and pseudoscience from a family resemblance perspective
The notion of family resemblance has recently emerged as a promising and fruitful approach to characterising the nature of science (NOS) in science education research, offering solutions to some perplexing challenges such as capturing both the domain-general and domain-specific features of science with a single framework. At the same time, however, criticism has been levelled that the resemblance might eventually extend to certain activities that are not scientific but pose as science. This would be an undesirable consequence for science educators, particularly given the increasing need for individuals to discern pseudoscientific claims circulated on social media from scientific information. Many pseudoscientific and non-scientific activities resemble science in terms of their aim to explain nature, their use of evidence-based methods, and their interrelation with politics and society. In this theoretical article, we build on the concept of family resemblance to consider how it can simultaneously explain the diversity and unity of science and help students to learn about the nature of science and that of pseudoscience in science education. We put forward three principles that can guide teaching about pseudoscience based on the family resemblance conceptualisation of science.
1265-1286
Park, Wonyong
eae3796e-fc99-43ba-98be-53ea5bdb14fc
Brock, Richard
f95e4bd3-642e-47fa-a61d-02f1ef9c128e
11 October 2022
Park, Wonyong
eae3796e-fc99-43ba-98be-53ea5bdb14fc
Brock, Richard
f95e4bd3-642e-47fa-a61d-02f1ef9c128e
Park, Wonyong and Brock, Richard
(2022)
Is there a limit to resemblances? Teaching about science and pseudoscience from a family resemblance perspective.
Science & Education, 32 (5), .
(doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00394-4).
Abstract
The notion of family resemblance has recently emerged as a promising and fruitful approach to characterising the nature of science (NOS) in science education research, offering solutions to some perplexing challenges such as capturing both the domain-general and domain-specific features of science with a single framework. At the same time, however, criticism has been levelled that the resemblance might eventually extend to certain activities that are not scientific but pose as science. This would be an undesirable consequence for science educators, particularly given the increasing need for individuals to discern pseudoscientific claims circulated on social media from scientific information. Many pseudoscientific and non-scientific activities resemble science in terms of their aim to explain nature, their use of evidence-based methods, and their interrelation with politics and society. In this theoretical article, we build on the concept of family resemblance to consider how it can simultaneously explain the diversity and unity of science and help students to learn about the nature of science and that of pseudoscience in science education. We put forward three principles that can guide teaching about pseudoscience based on the family resemblance conceptualisation of science.
Text
s11191-022-00394-4
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 September 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 October 2022
Published date: 11 October 2022
Additional Information:
© The Author(s) 2022.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 470625
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470625
ISSN: 0926-7220
PURE UUID: 8a4b5d3d-65ff-4d80-9ffd-e5e795401164
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Oct 2022 16:53
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Wonyong Park
Author:
Richard Brock
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics