The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Risk and dishonesty: assessing the willingness to lie in order to obtain vaccinations and furlough payments during the COVID-19 pandemic

Risk and dishonesty: assessing the willingness to lie in order to obtain vaccinations and furlough payments during the COVID-19 pandemic
Risk and dishonesty: assessing the willingness to lie in order to obtain vaccinations and furlough payments during the COVID-19 pandemic
For people across the globe, accessing resources such as vaccinations and furlough payments has been key for managing the health and financial risks following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, getting access to these resources has often proved challenging. For instance, in some countries, the demand for COVID-19 vaccinations was much higher than the availability. COVID-19 created a unique case to evaluate the possibility that the greater the (perceived) risk magnitude posed by the pandemic, the more likely it could be that individuals would engage in unethical behaviours to gain access to prized resources (e.g., vaccination). More specifically, we postulate that individuals would be more likely to cheat about their health or financial status in order to improve the probability of obtaining, respectively, vaccinations or furlough payments. To study this important topic, we have created a bespoke scenarios based on the COVID-19 pandemic and conducted three experimental studies to evaluate whether objective risk, perceived risk and other factors would impact participants’ intention to be dishonest in order to improve their chances of accessing pandemic risk management resources. Study 1 (N = 302) evaluated the extent to which the objective and perceived risk of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced individuals to provide false information about their health status to access a limited supply of vaccination. In Study 2 (N = 201) we assessed whether the extent to which individuals provided false information varied when we manipulated the information that would help them access a vaccination or access to furlough payments. Finally, Study 3 (N = 270) evaluated whether the willingness of individuals to cheat in order to access furlough payments was influenced by the risk (probability) that their dishonesty could be detected by the government. Across all three studies, our results show that approximately one third of all participants would cheat to access vaccinations or furlough payments. Study 1 found that the perceived risk, but not the objective risk, of the disease significantly predicted dishonesty when attempting to access vaccinations. While Study 2 found no difference in levels of dishonesty between those attempting to obtain a vaccination and those attempting to obtain furlough payments, the results showed that perceived risk significantly predicted dishonesty for vaccinations but not for furlough payments. Finally, Study 3 found a significant positive relationship between dishonesty and the risk of being detected. Taken together, our studies and results have important implications for ensuring that, during a pandemic, risk management resources can be allocated in a fair and judicious and that fraud can be reduced.
COVID-19, Dishonesty, Risk perceptions, Risk communication
Hanoch, Yaniv
3cf08e80-8bda-4d3b-af1c-46c858aa9f39
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Hanoch, Yaniv
3cf08e80-8bda-4d3b-af1c-46c858aa9f39
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a

Hanoch, Yaniv and Dawson, Ian (2022) Risk and dishonesty: assessing the willingness to lie in order to obtain vaccinations and furlough payments during the COVID-19 pandemic. IAREP Conference 2022: International Association for Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP), University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway. 09 - 12 Jun 2022.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

For people across the globe, accessing resources such as vaccinations and furlough payments has been key for managing the health and financial risks following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, getting access to these resources has often proved challenging. For instance, in some countries, the demand for COVID-19 vaccinations was much higher than the availability. COVID-19 created a unique case to evaluate the possibility that the greater the (perceived) risk magnitude posed by the pandemic, the more likely it could be that individuals would engage in unethical behaviours to gain access to prized resources (e.g., vaccination). More specifically, we postulate that individuals would be more likely to cheat about their health or financial status in order to improve the probability of obtaining, respectively, vaccinations or furlough payments. To study this important topic, we have created a bespoke scenarios based on the COVID-19 pandemic and conducted three experimental studies to evaluate whether objective risk, perceived risk and other factors would impact participants’ intention to be dishonest in order to improve their chances of accessing pandemic risk management resources. Study 1 (N = 302) evaluated the extent to which the objective and perceived risk of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced individuals to provide false information about their health status to access a limited supply of vaccination. In Study 2 (N = 201) we assessed whether the extent to which individuals provided false information varied when we manipulated the information that would help them access a vaccination or access to furlough payments. Finally, Study 3 (N = 270) evaluated whether the willingness of individuals to cheat in order to access furlough payments was influenced by the risk (probability) that their dishonesty could be detected by the government. Across all three studies, our results show that approximately one third of all participants would cheat to access vaccinations or furlough payments. Study 1 found that the perceived risk, but not the objective risk, of the disease significantly predicted dishonesty when attempting to access vaccinations. While Study 2 found no difference in levels of dishonesty between those attempting to obtain a vaccination and those attempting to obtain furlough payments, the results showed that perceived risk significantly predicted dishonesty for vaccinations but not for furlough payments. Finally, Study 3 found a significant positive relationship between dishonesty and the risk of being detected. Taken together, our studies and results have important implications for ensuring that, during a pandemic, risk management resources can be allocated in a fair and judicious and that fraud can be reduced.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 9 June 2022
Published date: 12 June 2022
Venue - Dates: IAREP Conference 2022: International Association for Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP), University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway, 2022-06-09 - 2022-06-12
Keywords: COVID-19, Dishonesty, Risk perceptions, Risk communication

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470679
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470679
PURE UUID: c30dbcc1-06af-49f6-b3aa-d363eeb0f83f
ORCID for Yaniv Hanoch: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-4588
ORCID for Ian Dawson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-9682

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Oct 2022 17:09
Last modified: 23 Feb 2023 03:19

Export record

Contributors

Author: Yaniv Hanoch ORCID iD
Author: Ian Dawson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×