The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Policymakers' agency and the structure: the case of medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal

Policymakers' agency and the structure: the case of medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal
Policymakers' agency and the structure: the case of medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal
The medium of instruction (MOI) has been a contested issue in multilingual polities globally, as English medium of instruction (EMI) has seen unprecedented growth, threatening the use and sometimes very survival of local/indigenous and even national languages. While the struggles to address related issues have been well researched, how and why local level policymakers enact the well-meant national policies in a way that marginalises indigenous languages and expands EMI has yet to receive due attention. The research is scarce especially when language policy and planning (LPP) is dealt with as part of overall educational governance. Drawing on in-depth interviews with senior policymakers in two similar constituencies in Nepal, and appropriating David Block's agency framework [(2012). Unpicking agency in sociolinguistic research with immigrants. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse, and ethnography (pp. 47-60). Routledge.], the paper shows the elements of structure that enable or delimit the decision-making of different policymakers concerning the MOI. While professing multilingualism as their ideal language policy, the policymakers are designing policies that sideline indigenous languages. This unintended outcome results from dealing with diverse aspects of structure, i.e. history, physical and imagined spaces, culture, and discourses around languages. Though situated within Nepal, the discussion has wider implications for understanding agentive acts in this globalising world and for LPP as part of general educational policymaking. Copyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
1466-4208
79-98
Prem, Prasad Poudel
d649663b-d349-43ff-86f2-ecd5b3b3589a
Choi, Tae-Hee
3cec7c93-92cd-4329-b0a7-3b208c65dcb7
Prem, Prasad Poudel
d649663b-d349-43ff-86f2-ecd5b3b3589a
Choi, Tae-Hee
3cec7c93-92cd-4329-b0a7-3b208c65dcb7

Prem, Prasad Poudel and Choi, Tae-Hee (2020) Policymakers' agency and the structure: the case of medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22 (1-2), 79-98. (doi:10.1080/14664208.2020.1741235).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The medium of instruction (MOI) has been a contested issue in multilingual polities globally, as English medium of instruction (EMI) has seen unprecedented growth, threatening the use and sometimes very survival of local/indigenous and even national languages. While the struggles to address related issues have been well researched, how and why local level policymakers enact the well-meant national policies in a way that marginalises indigenous languages and expands EMI has yet to receive due attention. The research is scarce especially when language policy and planning (LPP) is dealt with as part of overall educational governance. Drawing on in-depth interviews with senior policymakers in two similar constituencies in Nepal, and appropriating David Block's agency framework [(2012). Unpicking agency in sociolinguistic research with immigrants. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse, and ethnography (pp. 47-60). Routledge.], the paper shows the elements of structure that enable or delimit the decision-making of different policymakers concerning the MOI. While professing multilingualism as their ideal language policy, the policymakers are designing policies that sideline indigenous languages. This unintended outcome results from dealing with diverse aspects of structure, i.e. history, physical and imagined spaces, culture, and discourses around languages. Though situated within Nepal, the discussion has wider implications for understanding agentive acts in this globalising world and for LPP as part of general educational policymaking. Copyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 February 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 May 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470867
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470867
ISSN: 1466-4208
PURE UUID: c9ef7704-00d0-42d2-ba47-23b2772c16dd
ORCID for Tae-Hee Choi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-4082

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Oct 2022 16:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Prasad Poudel Prem
Author: Tae-Hee Choi ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×