The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Blindness/sightedness: disability studies and the defiance of di-vision

Blindness/sightedness: disability studies and the defiance of di-vision
Blindness/sightedness: disability studies and the defiance of di-vision
This chapter explores the potential for disability studies to counter the ongoing marginalisation of people living with vision impairment by interrogating ocular-centric and ocular-normative representations of blindness. Though a generally easy-to-define category of impairment, blindness, or vision impairment, is uniquely positioned socially, culturally, politically and theoretically. Ableist notions have a unique impact on concepts of vision, and thus on blindness, to which disability studies scholarship must respond. Both G. Kleege and M. Schillmeier insist that John Locke’s empirical project on blindness not only privileges visual perception, but also privileges sightedness as an authority to speak of blindness experiences. With specific regard to vision impairment, blindness features in the ancient Greek ‘culture of light’ at the limits of social and cultural boundaries, although paradoxically, vision-impaired people are also celebrated for having superior sight. Whether fully or partially sighted, congenitally or adventitiously blind, each person comes to know blindness in particular ways.
219-233
Routledge
Whitburn, Ben
ae7b4b48-a2c6-4c2b-8b95-29f8aa9af1ba
Michalko, Rod
0b8996fb-3c6d-4eac-adbd-2b926fa4efbd
Watson, Nick
Roulstone, Alan
Thomas, Carol
Whitburn, Ben
ae7b4b48-a2c6-4c2b-8b95-29f8aa9af1ba
Michalko, Rod
0b8996fb-3c6d-4eac-adbd-2b926fa4efbd
Watson, Nick
Roulstone, Alan
Thomas, Carol

Whitburn, Ben and Michalko, Rod (2019) Blindness/sightedness: disability studies and the defiance of di-vision. In, Watson, Nick, Roulstone, Alan and Thomas, Carol (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. (Routledge International Handbooks) Routledge, pp. 219-233. (doi:10.4324/9780429430817-16).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This chapter explores the potential for disability studies to counter the ongoing marginalisation of people living with vision impairment by interrogating ocular-centric and ocular-normative representations of blindness. Though a generally easy-to-define category of impairment, blindness, or vision impairment, is uniquely positioned socially, culturally, politically and theoretically. Ableist notions have a unique impact on concepts of vision, and thus on blindness, to which disability studies scholarship must respond. Both G. Kleege and M. Schillmeier insist that John Locke’s empirical project on blindness not only privileges visual perception, but also privileges sightedness as an authority to speak of blindness experiences. With specific regard to vision impairment, blindness features in the ancient Greek ‘culture of light’ at the limits of social and cultural boundaries, although paradoxically, vision-impaired people are also celebrated for having superior sight. Whether fully or partially sighted, congenitally or adventitiously blind, each person comes to know blindness in particular ways.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 5 November 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470975
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470975
PURE UUID: c7fbdc61-e3c9-433a-a0c3-63829ecdf09e
ORCID for Ben Whitburn: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-2803

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Oct 2022 16:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ben Whitburn ORCID iD
Author: Rod Michalko
Editor: Nick Watson
Editor: Alan Roulstone
Editor: Carol Thomas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×