Paradoxes in inclusive education: a necessary condition of relationality?
Paradoxes in inclusive education: a necessary condition of relationality?
Life’s paradoxes present across the varied landscapes we traverse in e ducation and serve as formidable barriers in attempts to secure ethica l consistency in practice. The presence of paradox invites educational researchers and practitioners to diligently examine our available cho ices, particularly when fixed by dominant ways of knowing/being. This too is especially consequential as these resources work for or against what we hold to be fundamental to our practice. This quandary is resp onded to here in three parts. The first section steps through a parado xical psychosocial assemblage created in Australian educational practi ce through the National Assessment Program–Literacy And Numeracy (NAPL AN). The second section then suggests possibilities for challenging pa radoxes around the status quo by reflecting on ways professionals from a range of countries in the Asia/Pacific region can reexamine their o wn practice as part of theoretically informed postgraduate research. T he third section discusses how paradoxes have persisted in Australian policy responses to disability, which evade substantiated ways of bein g and knowing inclusion. The relationships paradox invites us to are e ntangled and complex but in opening ourselves to prospects inherent in contradiction we challenge ourselves to explicating preferred ideals.
1003-1016
Corcoran, Tim
7e55930f-889c-4052-9638-7a1baaaaa25d
Claiborne, Lise
a53916a2-8b90-4f2a-b3d0-2c4f785a699d
Whitburn, Ben
ae7b4b48-a2c6-4c2b-8b95-29f8aa9af1ba
9 June 2019
Corcoran, Tim
7e55930f-889c-4052-9638-7a1baaaaa25d
Claiborne, Lise
a53916a2-8b90-4f2a-b3d0-2c4f785a699d
Whitburn, Ben
ae7b4b48-a2c6-4c2b-8b95-29f8aa9af1ba
Corcoran, Tim, Claiborne, Lise and Whitburn, Ben
(2019)
Paradoxes in inclusive education: a necessary condition of relationality?
International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23 (10), .
(doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1625453).
Abstract
Life’s paradoxes present across the varied landscapes we traverse in e ducation and serve as formidable barriers in attempts to secure ethica l consistency in practice. The presence of paradox invites educational researchers and practitioners to diligently examine our available cho ices, particularly when fixed by dominant ways of knowing/being. This too is especially consequential as these resources work for or against what we hold to be fundamental to our practice. This quandary is resp onded to here in three parts. The first section steps through a parado xical psychosocial assemblage created in Australian educational practi ce through the National Assessment Program–Literacy And Numeracy (NAPL AN). The second section then suggests possibilities for challenging pa radoxes around the status quo by reflecting on ways professionals from a range of countries in the Asia/Pacific region can reexamine their o wn practice as part of theoretically informed postgraduate research. T he third section discusses how paradoxes have persisted in Australian policy responses to disability, which evade substantiated ways of bein g and knowing inclusion. The relationships paradox invites us to are e ntangled and complex but in opening ourselves to prospects inherent in contradiction we challenge ourselves to explicating preferred ideals.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 9 June 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 470994
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470994
ISSN: 1360-3116
PURE UUID: ef48e18f-3b9c-46fd-80a7-23ef81df0963
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Oct 2022 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tim Corcoran
Author:
Lise Claiborne
Author:
Ben Whitburn
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics