The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Practices, governance, and politics: applying MacIntyre's ethics to business

Practices, governance, and politics: applying MacIntyre's ethics to business
Practices, governance, and politics: applying MacIntyre's ethics to business
This paper argues that attempts to apply Alasdair MacIntyre’s positive moral theory to business ethics are problematic, due to the cognitive closure of MacIntyre’s concept of a practice. I begin by outlining the notion of a practice,
before turning to Moore’s attempt to provide a MacIntyrean account of corporate
governance. I argue that Moore’s attempt is mismatched with MacIntyre’s account of moral education. Because the notion of practices resists general application I go on to argue that a negative application, which focuses on regulation, is more plausible. Large-scale regulation, usually thought antithetical to MacIntyre’s advocacy of small-scale politics, has the potential to facilitate practice-based work and reveals that MacIntyre’s own work can be used against his pessimism about the modern order. Furthermore, the conception of regulation I defend can show us how management is more amenable to ethical understanding than MacIntyre’s work is often taken to imply.
1052-150X
229 - 249
Sinnicks, Matthew
63b27aef-8672-4fa7-b2fa-388c9af51c57
Sinnicks, Matthew
63b27aef-8672-4fa7-b2fa-388c9af51c57

Sinnicks, Matthew (2014) Practices, governance, and politics: applying MacIntyre's ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24 (2), 229 - 249. (doi:10.5840/beq20145299).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper argues that attempts to apply Alasdair MacIntyre’s positive moral theory to business ethics are problematic, due to the cognitive closure of MacIntyre’s concept of a practice. I begin by outlining the notion of a practice,
before turning to Moore’s attempt to provide a MacIntyrean account of corporate
governance. I argue that Moore’s attempt is mismatched with MacIntyre’s account of moral education. Because the notion of practices resists general application I go on to argue that a negative application, which focuses on regulation, is more plausible. Large-scale regulation, usually thought antithetical to MacIntyre’s advocacy of small-scale politics, has the potential to facilitate practice-based work and reveals that MacIntyre’s own work can be used against his pessimism about the modern order. Furthermore, the conception of regulation I defend can show us how management is more amenable to ethical understanding than MacIntyre’s work is often taken to imply.

Text
Sinnicks - 2014 - Practices, Governance, Politics (AM) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (442kB)
Text
Sinnicks - 2014 - Practices, Governance, and Politics (BEQ) - Version of Record
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (278kB)
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 1 April 2014
Additional Information: Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 471117
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471117
ISSN: 1052-150X
PURE UUID: d45e3979-abb9-4324-8ea0-08e879958875
ORCID for Matthew Sinnicks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-5821

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Oct 2022 17:22
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Matthew Sinnicks ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×