The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Considerations for selecting cognitive endpoints and psychological patient-reported outcomes for clinical trials in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease

Considerations for selecting cognitive endpoints and psychological patient-reported outcomes for clinical trials in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease
Considerations for selecting cognitive endpoints and psychological patient-reported outcomes for clinical trials in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease

Pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience a range of medical complications that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in prophylactic and curative treatment approaches have highlighted the need for sensitive and clinically-meaningful trial endpoints. The detrimental effects of cognitive and psychological difficulties on social and economic mobility are well described. Although numerous reviews have assessed cognitive outcomes in other rare genetic disorders, SCD has not received the same focus. This review describes the cognitive (i.e., executive function and processing speed) and psychological domains (i.e., depression and anxiety) that are consistently associated with SCD pathology and, therefore, may be of particular interest as clinical trial endpoints. We then discuss corresponding well-validated and reliable cognitive tests and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that may be appropriate for clinical trials given their robust psychometric properties, ease of administration, and previous use in the SCD population. Further, we provide a discussion of potential pitfalls and considerations to guide endpoint selection. In line with the move toward patient-centered medicine, we identify specific tests (e.g., NIH Toolbox Cognition Module, Wechsler Cancellation Test) and psychological PROs (e.g., PROMIS depression and anxiety scales) that are sensitive to SCD morbidity and have the potential to capture changes that are clinically meaningful in the context of patients' day to day lives. In particularly vulnerable cognitive domains, such as executive function, we highlight the advantages of composite over single-test scores within the context of trials. We also identify general (i.e., practice effects, disease heterogeneity) and SCD-specific considerations (i.e., genotype, treatment course, and disease course, including degree of neurologic, pain, and sleep morbidity) for trial measures. Executive function composites hold particular promise as trial endpoints that are clinically meaningful, amenable to change, relatively easy to collect, and can be incorporated into the routine care of patients with SCD in various settings and countries.

executive function, processing speed, depression, anxiety, intervention
1664-2295
835823
Hood, Anna M.
aec0f143-3f19-4a0e-b13c-92ecfd3363a5
Crosby, Lori E.
4e8c0139-09a9-4e25-a86a-7a9ddf998cf4
Stotesbury, Hanne
1104423d-f215-4585-bb50-29b7fdd6c518
Kölbel, Melanie
2b9cb7ea-3fdf-450d-9b39-0f44d4ec46a7
Kirkham, Fenella J.
1dfbc0d5-aebe-4439-9fb2-dac6503bcd58
Hood, Anna M.
aec0f143-3f19-4a0e-b13c-92ecfd3363a5
Crosby, Lori E.
4e8c0139-09a9-4e25-a86a-7a9ddf998cf4
Stotesbury, Hanne
1104423d-f215-4585-bb50-29b7fdd6c518
Kölbel, Melanie
2b9cb7ea-3fdf-450d-9b39-0f44d4ec46a7
Kirkham, Fenella J.
1dfbc0d5-aebe-4439-9fb2-dac6503bcd58

Hood, Anna M., Crosby, Lori E., Stotesbury, Hanne, Kölbel, Melanie and Kirkham, Fenella J. (2022) Considerations for selecting cognitive endpoints and psychological patient-reported outcomes for clinical trials in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 835823. (doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.835823).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience a range of medical complications that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in prophylactic and curative treatment approaches have highlighted the need for sensitive and clinically-meaningful trial endpoints. The detrimental effects of cognitive and psychological difficulties on social and economic mobility are well described. Although numerous reviews have assessed cognitive outcomes in other rare genetic disorders, SCD has not received the same focus. This review describes the cognitive (i.e., executive function and processing speed) and psychological domains (i.e., depression and anxiety) that are consistently associated with SCD pathology and, therefore, may be of particular interest as clinical trial endpoints. We then discuss corresponding well-validated and reliable cognitive tests and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that may be appropriate for clinical trials given their robust psychometric properties, ease of administration, and previous use in the SCD population. Further, we provide a discussion of potential pitfalls and considerations to guide endpoint selection. In line with the move toward patient-centered medicine, we identify specific tests (e.g., NIH Toolbox Cognition Module, Wechsler Cancellation Test) and psychological PROs (e.g., PROMIS depression and anxiety scales) that are sensitive to SCD morbidity and have the potential to capture changes that are clinically meaningful in the context of patients' day to day lives. In particularly vulnerable cognitive domains, such as executive function, we highlight the advantages of composite over single-test scores within the context of trials. We also identify general (i.e., practice effects, disease heterogeneity) and SCD-specific considerations (i.e., genotype, treatment course, and disease course, including degree of neurologic, pain, and sleep morbidity) for trial measures. Executive function composites hold particular promise as trial endpoints that are clinically meaningful, amenable to change, relatively easy to collect, and can be incorporated into the routine care of patients with SCD in various settings and countries.

Text
fneur-13-835823 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 May 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 June 2022
Published date: 21 June 2022
Additional Information: Copyright © 2022 Hood, Crosby, Stotesbury, Kölbel and Kirkham.
Keywords: executive function, processing speed, depression, anxiety, intervention

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 471199
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471199
ISSN: 1664-2295
PURE UUID: 556fb218-3fff-4d80-9637-a9c65630c492
ORCID for Fenella J. Kirkham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2443-7958

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Oct 2022 17:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anna M. Hood
Author: Lori E. Crosby
Author: Hanne Stotesbury
Author: Melanie Kölbel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×