The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identifying injection drug use and estimating population size of people who inject drugs using healthcare administrative datasets

Identifying injection drug use and estimating population size of people who inject drugs using healthcare administrative datasets
Identifying injection drug use and estimating population size of people who inject drugs using healthcare administrative datasets

Background: Large linked healthcare administrative datasets could be used to monitor programs providing prevention and treatment services to people who inject drugs (PWID). However, diagnostic codes in administrative datasets do not differentiate non-injection from injection drug use (IDU). We validated algorithms based on diagnostic codes and prescription records representing IDU in administrative datasets against interview-based IDU data.

Methods: The British Columbia Hepatitis Testers Cohort (BC-HTC) includes ∼1.7 million individuals tested for HCV/HIV or reported HBV/HCV/HIV/tuberculosis cases in BC from 1990 to 2015, linked to administrative datasets including physician visit, hospitalization and prescription drug records. IDU, assessed through interviews as part of enhanced surveillance at the time of HIV or HCV/HBV diagnosis from a subset of cases included in the BC-HTC (n = 6559), was used as the gold standard. ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for IDU and injecting-related infections (IRI) were grouped with records of opioid substitution therapy (OST) into multiple IDU algorithms in administrative datasets. We assessed the performance of IDU algorithms through calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values.

Results: Sensitivity was highest (90-94%), and specificity was lowest (42-73%) for algorithms based either on IDU or IRI and drug misuse codes. Algorithms requiring both drug misuse and IRI had lower sensitivity (57-60%) and higher specificity (90-92%). An optimal sensitivity and specificity combination was found with two medical visits or a single hospitalization for injectable drugs with (83%/82%) and without OST (78%/83%), respectively. Based on algorithms that included two medical visits, a single hospitalization or OST records, there were 41,358 (1.2% of 11-65 years individuals in BC) recent PWID in BC based on health encounters during 3- year period (2013-2015).

Conclusion: Algorithms for identifying PWID using diagnostic codes in linked administrative data could be used for tracking the progress of programing aimed at PWID. With population-based datasets, this tool can be used to inform much needed estimates of PWID population size.

People who inject drugs, Injection drug use, Hepatitis C, Administrative data, Population size estimates
0955-3959
31-39
Janjua, Naveed Zafar
f5425a67-0e96-43a4-8256-61661e7d9076
Islam, Nazrul
e5345196-7479-438f-b4f6-c372d2135586
Kuo, Margot
6e3c938e-7e07-475a-9f1f-49f8a015e4b0
Yu, Amanda
ee6b985f-85a9-4948-965b-80c9ea9c978e
Wong, Stanley
0e8827b2-3219-4876-b634-36676288a2ff
Butt, Zahid A
69b1e8a4-9374-467f-b4c6-f6ea56400a4d
Gilbert, Mark
f1d12608-a0ff-46f3-8aff-fdd08b27031c
Buxton, Jane
6edd166f-686c-47e3-ae53-761186734a32
Chapinal, Nuria
caf5ea0f-056e-4abe-a668-f2de908f9821
Samji, Hasina
614bfb2b-842e-4b97-b8af-aa570858e178
Chong, Mei
35300377-04cb-41c9-8a57-8b434b8e38c3
Alvarez, Maria
b9ef0d3b-81cc-45cc-ae82-92661760d2b8
Wong, Jason
ed99d02f-3c83-47e7-818e-f66dbe495221
Tyndall, Mark W
cff7ce94-7b04-4954-a395-f5b233c4c384
Krajden, Mel
fb93cecf-2505-40c1-9343-0ede5373ecaf
BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort Team
Janjua, Naveed Zafar
f5425a67-0e96-43a4-8256-61661e7d9076
Islam, Nazrul
e5345196-7479-438f-b4f6-c372d2135586
Kuo, Margot
6e3c938e-7e07-475a-9f1f-49f8a015e4b0
Yu, Amanda
ee6b985f-85a9-4948-965b-80c9ea9c978e
Wong, Stanley
0e8827b2-3219-4876-b634-36676288a2ff
Butt, Zahid A
69b1e8a4-9374-467f-b4c6-f6ea56400a4d
Gilbert, Mark
f1d12608-a0ff-46f3-8aff-fdd08b27031c
Buxton, Jane
6edd166f-686c-47e3-ae53-761186734a32
Chapinal, Nuria
caf5ea0f-056e-4abe-a668-f2de908f9821
Samji, Hasina
614bfb2b-842e-4b97-b8af-aa570858e178
Chong, Mei
35300377-04cb-41c9-8a57-8b434b8e38c3
Alvarez, Maria
b9ef0d3b-81cc-45cc-ae82-92661760d2b8
Wong, Jason
ed99d02f-3c83-47e7-818e-f66dbe495221
Tyndall, Mark W
cff7ce94-7b04-4954-a395-f5b233c4c384
Krajden, Mel
fb93cecf-2505-40c1-9343-0ede5373ecaf

Janjua, Naveed Zafar, Islam, Nazrul, Kuo, Margot and Alvarez, Maria , BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort Team (2018) Identifying injection drug use and estimating population size of people who inject drugs using healthcare administrative datasets. International Journal of Drug Policy, 55 (5), 31-39. (doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Large linked healthcare administrative datasets could be used to monitor programs providing prevention and treatment services to people who inject drugs (PWID). However, diagnostic codes in administrative datasets do not differentiate non-injection from injection drug use (IDU). We validated algorithms based on diagnostic codes and prescription records representing IDU in administrative datasets against interview-based IDU data.

Methods: The British Columbia Hepatitis Testers Cohort (BC-HTC) includes ∼1.7 million individuals tested for HCV/HIV or reported HBV/HCV/HIV/tuberculosis cases in BC from 1990 to 2015, linked to administrative datasets including physician visit, hospitalization and prescription drug records. IDU, assessed through interviews as part of enhanced surveillance at the time of HIV or HCV/HBV diagnosis from a subset of cases included in the BC-HTC (n = 6559), was used as the gold standard. ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for IDU and injecting-related infections (IRI) were grouped with records of opioid substitution therapy (OST) into multiple IDU algorithms in administrative datasets. We assessed the performance of IDU algorithms through calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values.

Results: Sensitivity was highest (90-94%), and specificity was lowest (42-73%) for algorithms based either on IDU or IRI and drug misuse codes. Algorithms requiring both drug misuse and IRI had lower sensitivity (57-60%) and higher specificity (90-92%). An optimal sensitivity and specificity combination was found with two medical visits or a single hospitalization for injectable drugs with (83%/82%) and without OST (78%/83%), respectively. Based on algorithms that included two medical visits, a single hospitalization or OST records, there were 41,358 (1.2% of 11-65 years individuals in BC) recent PWID in BC based on health encounters during 3- year period (2013-2015).

Conclusion: Algorithms for identifying PWID using diagnostic codes in linked administrative data could be used for tracking the progress of programing aimed at PWID. With population-based datasets, this tool can be used to inform much needed estimates of PWID population size.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2018
Additional Information: Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: People who inject drugs, Injection drug use, Hepatitis C, Administrative data, Population size estimates

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 471428
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471428
ISSN: 0955-3959
PURE UUID: 44768cca-9f3f-46b6-b000-6446f69cd982
ORCID for Nazrul Islam: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3982-4325

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Nov 2022 17:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Naveed Zafar Janjua
Author: Nazrul Islam ORCID iD
Author: Margot Kuo
Author: Amanda Yu
Author: Stanley Wong
Author: Zahid A Butt
Author: Mark Gilbert
Author: Jane Buxton
Author: Nuria Chapinal
Author: Hasina Samji
Author: Mei Chong
Author: Maria Alvarez
Author: Jason Wong
Author: Mark W Tyndall
Author: Mel Krajden
Corporate Author: BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort Team

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×