Deservingness, the scope of justice, and actions toward others
Deservingness, the scope of justice, and actions toward others
In this chapter, the authors report three studies that examined the psychological mechanisms underlying the effects of several factors previously shown to influence decisions to help or harm a target. In particular, the studies tested whether the perceived deservingness of a target for favorable (or unfavorable) treatment or, instead, the inclusion (or exclusion) of the target in the perceiver’s “scope of justice” best accounted for the effects of variables that have been hypothesized by previous theorists to operate by means of the latter mechanism (inclusion-exclusion). In the rest of the two studies, the authors manipulated the usefulness of the target, the degree of conflict between the target and the perceiver, and the similarity between the target and the perceiver. The results of these studies provided some support for a deservingness perspective but no support for a scope of justice perspective. In a third study, the authors tested whether exclusion from the scope of justice might indeed occur, but only in relatively extreme conditions. They conclude the chapter with suggestions for future research on this issue.
125-149
Olson, James M.
36409aae-7f99-43ef-aa1d-b3dcdc15ee7d
Cheung, Irene
0b9875f1-7140-4981-b56f-604c6640eb38
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Hafer, Carolyn L.
f9c67565-a21c-4255-89bc-8197acfe7910
22 April 2010
Olson, James M.
36409aae-7f99-43ef-aa1d-b3dcdc15ee7d
Cheung, Irene
0b9875f1-7140-4981-b56f-604c6640eb38
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Hafer, Carolyn L.
f9c67565-a21c-4255-89bc-8197acfe7910
Olson, James M., Cheung, Irene, Conway, Paul and Hafer, Carolyn L.
(2010)
Deservingness, the scope of justice, and actions toward others.
In,
Bobocel, D. Ramona, Kay, Aaron C., Zanna, Mark P. and Olson, James M.
(eds.)
The Psychology of Justice and Legitimacy.
(Ontario Symposia on Personality and Social Psychology Series)
1st ed.
Psychology Press, .
(doi:10.4324/9780203837658-6).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In this chapter, the authors report three studies that examined the psychological mechanisms underlying the effects of several factors previously shown to influence decisions to help or harm a target. In particular, the studies tested whether the perceived deservingness of a target for favorable (or unfavorable) treatment or, instead, the inclusion (or exclusion) of the target in the perceiver’s “scope of justice” best accounted for the effects of variables that have been hypothesized by previous theorists to operate by means of the latter mechanism (inclusion-exclusion). In the rest of the two studies, the authors manipulated the usefulness of the target, the degree of conflict between the target and the perceiver, and the similarity between the target and the perceiver. The results of these studies provided some support for a deservingness perspective but no support for a scope of justice perspective. In a third study, the authors tested whether exclusion from the scope of justice might indeed occur, but only in relatively extreme conditions. They conclude the chapter with suggestions for future research on this issue.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 22 April 2010
Additional Information:
DOI of chapter (10.4324/9780203837658-10) does not work.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 471578
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471578
PURE UUID: da0b98f2-2628-4a43-988b-bca880bfd4d0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Nov 2022 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
James M. Olson
Author:
Irene Cheung
Author:
Paul Conway
Author:
Carolyn L. Hafer
Editor:
D. Ramona Bobocel
Editor:
Aaron C. Kay
Editor:
Mark P. Zanna
Editor:
James M. Olson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics