“Untangling” the effects of urban greenspace on mental health
“Untangling” the effects of urban greenspace on mental health
To improve causality, this thesis used the counterfactual framework to develop two novel and statistically robust approaches to analyse the effect of urban greenspace on mental health. The first approach was a cross-sectional assessment that used statistical matching in addition to regression modelling to establish the effect of local public greenspace on a person’s mental health for those with and without a private garden. The second approach used longitudinal data in a Before-After Control Intervention study design to establish the effect of the change in different greenspace characteristics on mental health when a person moved between urban areas. Both these approaches were applied to the British Household Panel Survey – a nationally representative survey of Great Britain containing individual-level information on mental health and the socio-economic confounders of mental health. Findings from the first approach suggested that the effect of access to private greenspace on mental health outweighs the beneficial effects of access to public greenspace. Specifically, having a private domestic garden substantially reduced the maximum probability of poor mental health for men and women, regardless of their access to local public greenspace. The second approach highlighted the importance of greenspace quality and proximity for mental health. Bird species richness and distance to nearest greenspace, proxy measures for greenspace quality and proximity respectively, provided the most inference when modelling the effect of change in greenspace characteristics on mental health. Comparatively, measures of greenspace quantity and recognised standards and guidelines of greenspace access provided less inference than a model that did not include a measure of greenspace. Given these results, greenspace quality, proximity and access to private gardens should be a priority for future policies to improve the status of both urban greenspace and mental health in Great Britain.
University of Southampton
Collins, Rebecca
2ecdff66-29af-40e5-94aa-4750e6f3fe1b
November 2022
Collins, Rebecca
2ecdff66-29af-40e5-94aa-4750e6f3fe1b
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Smith, Dianna
e859097c-f9f5-4fd0-8b07-59218648e726
Spake, Rebecca
1cda8ad0-2ab2-45d9-a844-ec3d8be2786a
Ogutu, Booker
4e36f1d2-f417-4274-8f9c-4470d4808746
Brown, Kerry
c281b42c-b7b0-4ca5-9d77-5008a0f2bcc5
Collins, Rebecca
(2022)
“Untangling” the effects of urban greenspace on mental health.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 222pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
To improve causality, this thesis used the counterfactual framework to develop two novel and statistically robust approaches to analyse the effect of urban greenspace on mental health. The first approach was a cross-sectional assessment that used statistical matching in addition to regression modelling to establish the effect of local public greenspace on a person’s mental health for those with and without a private garden. The second approach used longitudinal data in a Before-After Control Intervention study design to establish the effect of the change in different greenspace characteristics on mental health when a person moved between urban areas. Both these approaches were applied to the British Household Panel Survey – a nationally representative survey of Great Britain containing individual-level information on mental health and the socio-economic confounders of mental health. Findings from the first approach suggested that the effect of access to private greenspace on mental health outweighs the beneficial effects of access to public greenspace. Specifically, having a private domestic garden substantially reduced the maximum probability of poor mental health for men and women, regardless of their access to local public greenspace. The second approach highlighted the importance of greenspace quality and proximity for mental health. Bird species richness and distance to nearest greenspace, proxy measures for greenspace quality and proximity respectively, provided the most inference when modelling the effect of change in greenspace characteristics on mental health. Comparatively, measures of greenspace quantity and recognised standards and guidelines of greenspace access provided less inference than a model that did not include a measure of greenspace. Given these results, greenspace quality, proximity and access to private gardens should be a priority for future policies to improve the status of both urban greenspace and mental health in Great Britain.
Text
230106_RMC_thesis_accessible
- Version of Record
Text
Final-thesis-submission-declaration-Miss-Rebecca-Collins
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: November 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 471579
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471579
PURE UUID: 3a84862d-be2d-4b1a-ac93-c82825d73df8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Nov 2022 18:09
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Rebecca Collins
Thesis advisor:
Kerry Brown
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics