(Re)membering diaspora: uneven geographies of Indian dual citizenship
(Re)membering diaspora: uneven geographies of Indian dual citizenship
Although the concept of diaspora is sometimes regarded as oppositional to the interests of existing political regimes, we argue that it can become a site where the negotiation of new terms of membership embraces the transnational and de-territorialized networks of overseas populations. Drawing on work on transnational governance, we explore the uneven geographies that accompany India's recent discussions of its dual citizenship provisions. Constructions of diaspora membership are revealed by mapping the discourses contained within the Dual Citizenship legislation of 2003, the 2003 Pravasi Bharatiya Divas (Overseas India Day) campaign, and the 2001 report of the Diaspora Committee onto the case of South Africa. The results suggest that the construction of diaspora membership focuses on professional success, ecumenical Hinduism, and multicultural incorporation. We also trace how diaspora membership betrays a continuing anxiety over the terms of Indianness. The results remind us that diasporic times and spaces mediate transnational governance.
757-774
Dickinson, Jen
11c18e3e-dad8-4bfc-91ee-9322fea472e5
Bailey, Adrian J.
2def1d1a-0408-48a6-8ec3-745f1ece7ede
1 September 2007
Dickinson, Jen
11c18e3e-dad8-4bfc-91ee-9322fea472e5
Bailey, Adrian J.
2def1d1a-0408-48a6-8ec3-745f1ece7ede
Dickinson, Jen and Bailey, Adrian J.
(2007)
(Re)membering diaspora: uneven geographies of Indian dual citizenship.
Political Geography, 26 (7), .
(doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.03.007).
Abstract
Although the concept of diaspora is sometimes regarded as oppositional to the interests of existing political regimes, we argue that it can become a site where the negotiation of new terms of membership embraces the transnational and de-territorialized networks of overseas populations. Drawing on work on transnational governance, we explore the uneven geographies that accompany India's recent discussions of its dual citizenship provisions. Constructions of diaspora membership are revealed by mapping the discourses contained within the Dual Citizenship legislation of 2003, the 2003 Pravasi Bharatiya Divas (Overseas India Day) campaign, and the 2001 report of the Diaspora Committee onto the case of South Africa. The results suggest that the construction of diaspora membership focuses on professional success, ecumenical Hinduism, and multicultural incorporation. We also trace how diaspora membership betrays a continuing anxiety over the terms of Indianness. The results remind us that diasporic times and spaces mediate transnational governance.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 September 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 471708
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471708
ISSN: 0962-6298
PURE UUID: d5a7bcb9-d485-485a-9e1d-29d4ff85484b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Nov 2022 18:27
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jen Dickinson
Author:
Adrian J. Bailey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics