The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Speed-dependent modulation of wing muscle recruitment intensity and kinematics in two bat species.

Speed-dependent modulation of wing muscle recruitment intensity and kinematics in two bat species.
Speed-dependent modulation of wing muscle recruitment intensity and kinematics in two bat species.
Animals respond to changes in power requirements during locomotion by modulating the intensity of recruitment of their propulsive musculature, but many questions concerning how muscle recruitment varies with speed across modes of locomotion remain unanswered. We measured normalized average burst EMG (aEMG) for pectoralis major and biceps brachii at different flight speeds in two relatively distantly related bat species: the aerial insectivore Eptesicus fuscus, and the primarily fruit-eating Carollia perspicillata These ecologically distinct species employ different flight behaviors but possess similar wing aspect ratio, wing loading and body mass. Because propulsive requirements usually correlate with body size, and aEMG likely reflects force, we hypothesized that these species would deploy similar speed-dependent aEMG modulation. Instead, we found that aEMG was speed independent in E. fuscus and modulated in a U-shaped or linearly increasing relationship with speed in C. perspicillata This interspecific difference may be related to differences in muscle fiber type composition and/or overall patterns of recruitment of the large ensemble of muscles that participate in actuating the highly articulated bat wing. We also found interspecific differences in the speed dependence of 3D wing kinematics: E. fuscus modulates wing flexion during upstroke significantly more than C. perspicillata Overall, we observed two different strategies to increase flight speed: C. perspicillata tends to modulate aEMG, and E. fuscus tends to modulate wing kinematics. These strategies may reflect different requirements for avoiding negative lift and overcoming drag during slow and fast flight, respectively, a subject we suggest merits further study.
0022-0949
1820–1829
Konow, Nicolai
5007b728-a5cb-426b-8eca-6470c5a2d8d7
Cheney, Jorn A.
3cf74c48-4eba-4622-9f29-518653d79d93
Roberts, Thomas J.
6b1bb45e-dad5-4a04-92ee-ad05cbf24dab
Iriarte-Díaz, Jose
2f5fda94-a62f-440d-9faf-e7e6216a14ee
Breuer, Kenneth S.
4135a9b1-05d3-4b83-b25e-b7b9e7f30b46
Waldman, J. Rhea S.
4198a12c-43fd-4b66-82d4-3d7814745891
Swartz, Sharon M.
8112b896-ef39-413e-abed-8d21e9e58cfc
Konow, Nicolai
5007b728-a5cb-426b-8eca-6470c5a2d8d7
Cheney, Jorn A.
3cf74c48-4eba-4622-9f29-518653d79d93
Roberts, Thomas J.
6b1bb45e-dad5-4a04-92ee-ad05cbf24dab
Iriarte-Díaz, Jose
2f5fda94-a62f-440d-9faf-e7e6216a14ee
Breuer, Kenneth S.
4135a9b1-05d3-4b83-b25e-b7b9e7f30b46
Waldman, J. Rhea S.
4198a12c-43fd-4b66-82d4-3d7814745891
Swartz, Sharon M.
8112b896-ef39-413e-abed-8d21e9e58cfc

Konow, Nicolai, Cheney, Jorn A., Roberts, Thomas J., Iriarte-Díaz, Jose, Breuer, Kenneth S., Waldman, J. Rhea S. and Swartz, Sharon M. (2017) Speed-dependent modulation of wing muscle recruitment intensity and kinematics in two bat species. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 220 (10), 1820–1829. (doi:10.1242/jeb.144550).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Animals respond to changes in power requirements during locomotion by modulating the intensity of recruitment of their propulsive musculature, but many questions concerning how muscle recruitment varies with speed across modes of locomotion remain unanswered. We measured normalized average burst EMG (aEMG) for pectoralis major and biceps brachii at different flight speeds in two relatively distantly related bat species: the aerial insectivore Eptesicus fuscus, and the primarily fruit-eating Carollia perspicillata These ecologically distinct species employ different flight behaviors but possess similar wing aspect ratio, wing loading and body mass. Because propulsive requirements usually correlate with body size, and aEMG likely reflects force, we hypothesized that these species would deploy similar speed-dependent aEMG modulation. Instead, we found that aEMG was speed independent in E. fuscus and modulated in a U-shaped or linearly increasing relationship with speed in C. perspicillata This interspecific difference may be related to differences in muscle fiber type composition and/or overall patterns of recruitment of the large ensemble of muscles that participate in actuating the highly articulated bat wing. We also found interspecific differences in the speed dependence of 3D wing kinematics: E. fuscus modulates wing flexion during upstroke significantly more than C. perspicillata Overall, we observed two different strategies to increase flight speed: C. perspicillata tends to modulate aEMG, and E. fuscus tends to modulate wing kinematics. These strategies may reflect different requirements for avoiding negative lift and overcoming drag during slow and fast flight, respectively, a subject we suggest merits further study.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 May 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 471794
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471794
ISSN: 0022-0949
PURE UUID: 63b3efa9-289b-4f4b-b6dc-7cd19d624a77
ORCID for Jorn A. Cheney: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-2612

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Nov 2022 17:48
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicolai Konow
Author: Jorn A. Cheney ORCID iD
Author: Thomas J. Roberts
Author: Jose Iriarte-Díaz
Author: Kenneth S. Breuer
Author: J. Rhea S. Waldman
Author: Sharon M. Swartz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×