Open & transparent research practices: case study –chemistry

Abstract

Openness and transparency constitute a foundational principle for research integrity, as set out in the UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity. Openness can promote rigour, constructive scrutiny, accountability and can enable others to build on research. However, it can also bring challenges. Critically, what openness and transparency can and should mean varies across disciplines and fields of study. This is one of a series of case studies in a wide range of disciplines that illustrate these differences. The series is intended to enable researchers to see similarities and differences between fields, and to inform those supporting open research through, for example, training, policies or incentives. This case study is primarily based on the field of chemistry, although delves into examples pertaining to the whole of the physical sciences domain and its interfaces with other domains. It is based on a single interview with a researcher, and is therefore illustrative rather than representative.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Samantha Kanza: orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-9489

ORCID for Nicola Knight: orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-3835

Catalogue record

Export record