The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sexing bones: improving transparency of sex reporting to address bias within preclinical studies

Sexing bones: improving transparency of sex reporting to address bias within preclinical studies
Sexing bones: improving transparency of sex reporting to address bias within preclinical studies
Despite knowledge that sexually dimorphic mechanisms regulate bone homeostasis, sex often remains unreported and unconsidered in preclinical experimental design. Failure to report sex could lead to inappropriate generalizations of research findings and less effective translation into clinical practice. Preclinical sex bias (preferential selection of one sex) is present across other fields, including neuroscience and immunology, but remains uninvestigated in skeletal research. For context, we first summarized key literature describing sexually dimorphic bone phenotypes in mice. We then investigated sex reporting practices in skeletal research, specifically how customary it is for murine sex to be included in journal article titles or abstracts and then determined whether any bias in sex reporting exists. Because sex hormones are important regulators of bone health (gonadectomy procedures, ie, ovariectomy [OVX] and orchidectomy [ORX], are common yet typically not reported with sex), we incorporated reporting of OVX and ORX terms, representing female and male mice, respectively, into our investigations around sex bias. Between 1999 and 2020, inclusion of sex in titles or abstracts was low in murine skeletal studies (2.6%–4.06%). Reporting of OVX and ORX terms was low (1.44%–2.64%) and reporting of OVX and ORX with sex uncommon (0.4%–0.3%). When studies were combined to include both sexes and OVX (representing female) and ORX terms (representing male), a bias toward reporting of female mice was evident. However, when the terms OVX and ORX were removed, a bias toward the use of male mice was identified. Thus, studies focusing on sex hormones are biased toward female reporting with all other studies biased in reporting of male mice. We now call upon journal editors to introduce consistent guidance for transparent and accessible reporting of murine sex in skeletal research to better monitor preclinical sex bias, to diversify development of treatments for bone health, and to enable global skeletal health equity. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
AGING, GENETIC ANIMAL MODELS, OSTEOPOROSIS, PRECLINICAL STUDIES, SEX STEROIDS
0884-0431
5-13
Sharma, Aikta
aebd33fc-d168-4bd6-b861-93384a64e072
Michels, Lysanne V.
d3d32d1b-0543-4654-9ed8-0b73b2b49256
Pitsillides, Andrew A.
4f948464-a3a4-4d71-b280-9f8a4387ac15
Greeves, Julie
5fa56940-ad6e-4a78-97e1-881933893bae
Plotkin, Lillian I.
530de927-1f84-43b2-ae58-59a3da632587
Cardo, Valentina
87fafbf1-f6c0-4454-a39a-9173d7bd7f5e
Sims, Natalie A.
0b19658c-98b4-4677-ad71-51dfb2d586e3
Clarkin, Claire E.
05cd2a88-1127-41aa-a29b-7ac323b4f3c9
Sharma, Aikta
aebd33fc-d168-4bd6-b861-93384a64e072
Michels, Lysanne V.
d3d32d1b-0543-4654-9ed8-0b73b2b49256
Pitsillides, Andrew A.
4f948464-a3a4-4d71-b280-9f8a4387ac15
Greeves, Julie
5fa56940-ad6e-4a78-97e1-881933893bae
Plotkin, Lillian I.
530de927-1f84-43b2-ae58-59a3da632587
Cardo, Valentina
87fafbf1-f6c0-4454-a39a-9173d7bd7f5e
Sims, Natalie A.
0b19658c-98b4-4677-ad71-51dfb2d586e3
Clarkin, Claire E.
05cd2a88-1127-41aa-a29b-7ac323b4f3c9

Sharma, Aikta, Michels, Lysanne V., Pitsillides, Andrew A., Greeves, Julie, Plotkin, Lillian I., Cardo, Valentina, Sims, Natalie A. and Clarkin, Claire E. (2022) Sexing bones: improving transparency of sex reporting to address bias within preclinical studies. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 38 (1), 5-13. (doi:10.1002/jbmr.4729).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Despite knowledge that sexually dimorphic mechanisms regulate bone homeostasis, sex often remains unreported and unconsidered in preclinical experimental design. Failure to report sex could lead to inappropriate generalizations of research findings and less effective translation into clinical practice. Preclinical sex bias (preferential selection of one sex) is present across other fields, including neuroscience and immunology, but remains uninvestigated in skeletal research. For context, we first summarized key literature describing sexually dimorphic bone phenotypes in mice. We then investigated sex reporting practices in skeletal research, specifically how customary it is for murine sex to be included in journal article titles or abstracts and then determined whether any bias in sex reporting exists. Because sex hormones are important regulators of bone health (gonadectomy procedures, ie, ovariectomy [OVX] and orchidectomy [ORX], are common yet typically not reported with sex), we incorporated reporting of OVX and ORX terms, representing female and male mice, respectively, into our investigations around sex bias. Between 1999 and 2020, inclusion of sex in titles or abstracts was low in murine skeletal studies (2.6%–4.06%). Reporting of OVX and ORX terms was low (1.44%–2.64%) and reporting of OVX and ORX with sex uncommon (0.4%–0.3%). When studies were combined to include both sexes and OVX (representing female) and ORX terms (representing male), a bias toward reporting of female mice was evident. However, when the terms OVX and ORX were removed, a bias toward the use of male mice was identified. Thus, studies focusing on sex hormones are biased toward female reporting with all other studies biased in reporting of male mice. We now call upon journal editors to introduce consistent guidance for transparent and accessible reporting of murine sex in skeletal research to better monitor preclinical sex bias, to diversify development of treatments for bone health, and to enable global skeletal health equity. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Text
J of Bone Mineral Res - 2022 - Sharma - Sexing Bones Improving Transparency of Sex Reporting to Address Bias Within - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 October 2022
Published date: 13 November 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: Authors’ roles: Conceptualization: AS, VC, and CEC. Formal analysis: AS, LVM, and LIP. Funding acquisition: CEC. Investigation: AS, LVM, and LIP. Methodology: AS, LVM, LIP, VC, NAS, and CEC. Project administration: AS and CEC. Resources: AS, LVM, LIP, VC, NAS, and CEC. Software: AS, LVM, and LIP. Supervision: CEC. Validation: AS, LVM, and CEC. Visualization: AS, VC, LIP, NAS, and CEC. Writing—original draft preparation: AS, AAP, JG, LIP, VC, NAS, and CEC. Writing—review & editing: AS and CEC.
Keywords: AGING, GENETIC ANIMAL MODELS, OSTEOPOROSIS, PRECLINICAL STUDIES, SEX STEROIDS

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472365
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472365
ISSN: 0884-0431
PURE UUID: 4d85d0d9-db82-417f-9f9e-926cc786abb6
ORCID for Valentina Cardo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1993-6058

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Dec 2022 17:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Aikta Sharma
Author: Andrew A. Pitsillides
Author: Julie Greeves
Author: Lillian I. Plotkin
Author: Valentina Cardo ORCID iD
Author: Natalie A. Sims

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×