The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Still feeling it: The time course of emotional recovery from an attentional perspective

Still feeling it: The time course of emotional recovery from an attentional perspective
Still feeling it: The time course of emotional recovery from an attentional perspective
Emotional reactivity and the time taken to recover, particularly from negative, stressful, events, are inextricably linked, and both are crucial for maintaining well-being. It is unclear, however, to what extent emotional reactivity during stimulus onset predicts the time course of recovery after stimulus offset. To address this question, 25 participants viewed arousing (negative and positive) and neutral pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) followed by task-relevant face targets, which were to be gender categorized. Faces were presented early (400–1500 ms) or late (2400–3500 ms) after picture offset to capture the time course of recovery from emotional stimuli. Measures of reaction time (RT), as well as face-locked N170 and P3 components were taken as indicators of the impact of lingering emotion on attentional facilitation or interference. Electrophysiological effects revealed negative and positive images to facilitate face-target processing on the P3 component, regardless of temporal interval. At the individual level, increased reactivity to: (1) negative pictures, quantified as the IAPS picture-locked Late Positive Potential (LPP), predicted larger attentional interference on the face-locked P3 component to faces presented in the late time window after picture offset. (2) Positive pictures, denoted by the LPP, predicted larger facilitation on the face-locked P3 component to faces presented in the earlier time window after picture offset. These results suggest that subsequent processing is still impacted up to 3500 ms after the offset of negative pictures and 1500 ms after the offset of positive pictures for individuals reacting more strongly to these pictures, respectively. Such findings emphasize the importance of individual differences in reactivity when predicting the temporality of emotional recovery. The current experimental model provides a novel basis for future research aiming to identify profiles of adaptive and maladaptive recovery.
1662-5161
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
Taylor, Alexander N. W.
d5cb6c65-2df4-4adc-b844-4911f846af38
Roesch, Etienne B.
0ee97dc1-e9c5-46b1-96f9-07f6bbe0aba6
van Reekum, Carien M
56010ab6-5a14-4c5a-b463-eb2159b3684c
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
Taylor, Alexander N. W.
d5cb6c65-2df4-4adc-b844-4911f846af38
Roesch, Etienne B.
0ee97dc1-e9c5-46b1-96f9-07f6bbe0aba6
van Reekum, Carien M
56010ab6-5a14-4c5a-b463-eb2159b3684c

Morriss, Jayne, Taylor, Alexander N. W., Roesch, Etienne B. and van Reekum, Carien M (2013) Still feeling it: The time course of emotional recovery from an attentional perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, [201]. (doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00201).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Emotional reactivity and the time taken to recover, particularly from negative, stressful, events, are inextricably linked, and both are crucial for maintaining well-being. It is unclear, however, to what extent emotional reactivity during stimulus onset predicts the time course of recovery after stimulus offset. To address this question, 25 participants viewed arousing (negative and positive) and neutral pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) followed by task-relevant face targets, which were to be gender categorized. Faces were presented early (400–1500 ms) or late (2400–3500 ms) after picture offset to capture the time course of recovery from emotional stimuli. Measures of reaction time (RT), as well as face-locked N170 and P3 components were taken as indicators of the impact of lingering emotion on attentional facilitation or interference. Electrophysiological effects revealed negative and positive images to facilitate face-target processing on the P3 component, regardless of temporal interval. At the individual level, increased reactivity to: (1) negative pictures, quantified as the IAPS picture-locked Late Positive Potential (LPP), predicted larger attentional interference on the face-locked P3 component to faces presented in the late time window after picture offset. (2) Positive pictures, denoted by the LPP, predicted larger facilitation on the face-locked P3 component to faces presented in the earlier time window after picture offset. These results suggest that subsequent processing is still impacted up to 3500 ms after the offset of negative pictures and 1500 ms after the offset of positive pictures for individuals reacting more strongly to these pictures, respectively. Such findings emphasize the importance of individual differences in reactivity when predicting the temporality of emotional recovery. The current experimental model provides a novel basis for future research aiming to identify profiles of adaptive and maladaptive recovery.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 21 May 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472400
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472400
ISSN: 1662-5161
PURE UUID: c94ece62-1e25-4e2a-bd89-e5dbdc774f4d
ORCID for Jayne Morriss: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-9673

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Dec 2022 17:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jayne Morriss ORCID iD
Author: Alexander N. W. Taylor
Author: Etienne B. Roesch
Author: Carien M van Reekum

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×