What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation
What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation
Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by recording the gaze of a spider Fearful and Non-fearful group while they performed a simple “follow the cross” task. There was no difference in first saccade latencies. Saccade trajectories showed a general hypervigilance for all stimuli in the Fearful group. Saccade landing positions corresponded to what each group would find arousing, such that the Fearful group deviated towards both types of images whereas the Non-fearful group deviated towards pleasant images. Secondary corrective saccade latencies away from threat-related stimuli were longer for the Fearful group (difficulty in disengaging) compared with the Non-fearful group. These results suggest that attentional biases towards arousing stimuli may occur at different processing stages.
168-174
McSorley, Eugene
e510da20-a293-4441-a94a-4cdea5c51619
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
McSorley, Eugene
e510da20-a293-4441-a94a-4cdea5c51619
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
McSorley, Eugene and Morriss, Jayne
(2015)
What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation.
Cognition and Emotion, 31 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1081872).
Abstract
Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by recording the gaze of a spider Fearful and Non-fearful group while they performed a simple “follow the cross” task. There was no difference in first saccade latencies. Saccade trajectories showed a general hypervigilance for all stimuli in the Fearful group. Saccade landing positions corresponded to what each group would find arousing, such that the Fearful group deviated towards both types of images whereas the Non-fearful group deviated towards pleasant images. Secondary corrective saccade latencies away from threat-related stimuli were longer for the Fearful group (difficulty in disengaging) compared with the Non-fearful group. These results suggest that attentional biases towards arousing stimuli may occur at different processing stages.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 September 2015
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 472407
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472407
ISSN: 0269-9931
PURE UUID: de982924-586a-4deb-9961-f573141dfa0a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Dec 2022 17:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eugene McSorley
Author:
Jayne Morriss
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics