Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction
Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction
Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) tend to find uncertainty unacceptable and aversive. In recent years, research has shed light on the role of IU in modulating subjective (i.e. expectancy ratings) and psychophysiological responses (i.e. skin conductance) across different classical fear conditioning procedures. In particular, during immediate extinction higher IU is associated with disrupted safety learning. However, there remain gaps in understanding how IU, in comparison to other negative emotionality traits (STAI-T), impact different types of subjective and psychophysiological measures during different classical fear conditioning procedures. In our exploratory study, we analyzed IU, STAI-T, subjective (i.e. fear ratings) and psychophysiological (i.e. skin conductance, auditory startle blink) data recorded during fear acquisition training and 24 h-delayed extinction training (n = 66). Higher IU, controlled for STAI-T, was: (1) significantly associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear cue during fear acquisition training, and (2) at trend associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear versus safe cue during delayed extinction training. Null results were observed for both IU and STAI-T in relation to skin conductance and auditory startle blink during fear acquisition training and delayed extinction training. These results add to and extend our current understanding of the role of IU on subjective and physiological measures during different fear conditioning procedures particularly that of subjective fear ratings during acquisition and delayed extinction training. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.
Auditory startle blink, Extinction, Fear, Intolerance of uncertainty, Ratings, Skin conductance
249-259
Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren
16abca50-b3a2-4f24-8ed5-31f0f5a2598d
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
Lonsdorf, Tina B
463a4e71-6feb-467a-9c1b-90ebe44d0d3d
July 2022
Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren
16abca50-b3a2-4f24-8ed5-31f0f5a2598d
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
Lonsdorf, Tina B
463a4e71-6feb-467a-9c1b-90ebe44d0d3d
Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren, Morriss, Jayne and Lonsdorf, Tina B
(2022)
Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction.
International Journal of Psychophysiology, 177, .
(doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.006).
Abstract
Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) tend to find uncertainty unacceptable and aversive. In recent years, research has shed light on the role of IU in modulating subjective (i.e. expectancy ratings) and psychophysiological responses (i.e. skin conductance) across different classical fear conditioning procedures. In particular, during immediate extinction higher IU is associated with disrupted safety learning. However, there remain gaps in understanding how IU, in comparison to other negative emotionality traits (STAI-T), impact different types of subjective and psychophysiological measures during different classical fear conditioning procedures. In our exploratory study, we analyzed IU, STAI-T, subjective (i.e. fear ratings) and psychophysiological (i.e. skin conductance, auditory startle blink) data recorded during fear acquisition training and 24 h-delayed extinction training (n = 66). Higher IU, controlled for STAI-T, was: (1) significantly associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear cue during fear acquisition training, and (2) at trend associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear versus safe cue during delayed extinction training. Null results were observed for both IU and STAI-T in relation to skin conductance and auditory startle blink during fear acquisition training and delayed extinction training. These results add to and extend our current understanding of the role of IU on subjective and physiological measures during different fear conditioning procedures particularly that of subjective fear ratings during acquisition and delayed extinction training. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 May 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 May 2022
Published date: July 2022
Additional Information:
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Auditory startle blink, Extinction, Fear, Intolerance of uncertainty, Ratings, Skin conductance
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 472415
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472415
ISSN: 0167-8760
PURE UUID: 9f968bdb-1d80-4621-b25c-d6cca17bcdb7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Dec 2022 17:39
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens
Author:
Jayne Morriss
Author:
Tina B Lonsdorf
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics