Intolerance of uncertainty and threat reversal: a conceptual replication of Morriss et al. (2019)
Intolerance of uncertainty and threat reversal: a conceptual replication of Morriss et al. (2019)
The ability to update responding to threat cues is an important adaptive ability. Recently, Morriss et al. (2019) demonstrated that participants scoring high in Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) were more capable of threat reversal. The current report aimed to conceptually replicate these results of Morriss et al. (2019) in an independent sample using a comparable paradigm (n = 102). Following a threat conditioning phase, participants were told that cues associated with threat and safety from electric shock would reverse. Responding was measured with skin conductance and fear potentiated startle. We failed to conceptually replicate the results of Morriss et al. (2019). Instead, we found that, for participants who received precise contingency instructions prior to acquisition, lower IUS (controlling for STAI-T) relative to higher IUS was associated with greater threat reversal, indexed via skin conductance responses. These results suggest that IU and contingency instructions differentially modulate the course of threat reversal.
Cues, Fear, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Reflex, Startle, Uncertainty
103799
Mertens, Gaëtan
f42d29f1-e6db-4064-8ce0-dc91bab3cc6d
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
February 2021
Mertens, Gaëtan
f42d29f1-e6db-4064-8ce0-dc91bab3cc6d
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
Mertens, Gaëtan and Morriss, Jayne
(2021)
Intolerance of uncertainty and threat reversal: a conceptual replication of Morriss et al. (2019).
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 137, .
(doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103799).
Abstract
The ability to update responding to threat cues is an important adaptive ability. Recently, Morriss et al. (2019) demonstrated that participants scoring high in Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) were more capable of threat reversal. The current report aimed to conceptually replicate these results of Morriss et al. (2019) in an independent sample using a comparable paradigm (n = 102). Following a threat conditioning phase, participants were told that cues associated with threat and safety from electric shock would reverse. Responding was measured with skin conductance and fear potentiated startle. We failed to conceptually replicate the results of Morriss et al. (2019). Instead, we found that, for participants who received precise contingency instructions prior to acquisition, lower IUS (controlling for STAI-T) relative to higher IUS was associated with greater threat reversal, indexed via skin conductance responses. These results suggest that IU and contingency instructions differentially modulate the course of threat reversal.
Text
1-s2.0-S0005796720302539-main
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 January 2021
Published date: February 2021
Additional Information:
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Cues, Fear, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Reflex, Startle, Uncertainty
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 472422
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472422
ISSN: 0005-7967
PURE UUID: 4845af58-99eb-47aa-ab69-2217ad32023b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Dec 2022 17:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gaëtan Mertens
Author:
Jayne Morriss
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics