Wittgenstein's later nonsense
Wittgenstein's later nonsense
According to an influential reading of his later philosophy, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense can result from combining expressions in ways prohibited by the rules to which their use is subject. According to another influential reading, the later Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense only ever results from privation—that is, from a failure to assign a meaning to one or more of the relevant expressions. This chapter challenges Glock’s defence of the view that the later Wittgenstein allows for combinatorial nonsense. In doing so, it defends a version of the privation view. According to it, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense results, not so much from a failure to assign a meaning to an expression, as a failure to use an expression in a way that has a point or purpose. As the chapter shows, this interpretation is consistent with prominent themes in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, such as that meaning and explanation are coordinate notions, that for a word to have a meaning is for there to be a rule-governed practice of using it, that the rules of the practice are arbitrary, and that they determine the bounds of sense.
Whiting, Daniel
c0847bb4-963e-470d-92a2-5c8aae5d5aef
28 October 2022
Whiting, Daniel
c0847bb4-963e-470d-92a2-5c8aae5d5aef
Whiting, Daniel
(2022)
Wittgenstein's later nonsense.
In,
Pfisterer, Christoph, Rathgeb, Nicole and Schmidt, Eva
(eds.)
Wittgenstein and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Hans-Johann Glock.
1st ed.
Routledge.
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
According to an influential reading of his later philosophy, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense can result from combining expressions in ways prohibited by the rules to which their use is subject. According to another influential reading, the later Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense only ever results from privation—that is, from a failure to assign a meaning to one or more of the relevant expressions. This chapter challenges Glock’s defence of the view that the later Wittgenstein allows for combinatorial nonsense. In doing so, it defends a version of the privation view. According to it, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense results, not so much from a failure to assign a meaning to an expression, as a failure to use an expression in a way that has a point or purpose. As the chapter shows, this interpretation is consistent with prominent themes in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, such as that meaning and explanation are coordinate notions, that for a word to have a meaning is for there to be a rule-governed practice of using it, that the rules of the practice are arbitrary, and that they determine the bounds of sense.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 28 October 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 472478
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472478
PURE UUID: 09432e46-06e4-483d-bf86-f380129868c0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Dec 2022 17:41
Last modified: 26 May 2023 16:34
Export record
Contributors
Editor:
Christoph Pfisterer
Editor:
Nicole Rathgeb
Editor:
Eva Schmidt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics