The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Wittgenstein's later nonsense

Wittgenstein's later nonsense
Wittgenstein's later nonsense
According to an influential reading of his later philosophy, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense can result from combining expressions in ways prohibited by the rules to which their use is subject. According to another influential reading, the later Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense only ever results from privation—that is, from a failure to assign a meaning to one or more of the relevant expressions. This chapter challenges Glock’s defence of the view that the later Wittgenstein allows for combinatorial nonsense. In doing so, it defends a version of the privation view. According to it, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense results, not so much from a failure to assign a meaning to an expression, as a failure to use an expression in a way that has a point or purpose. As the chapter shows, this interpretation is consistent with prominent themes in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, such as that meaning and explanation are coordinate notions, that for a word to have a meaning is for there to be a rule-governed practice of using it, that the rules of the practice are arbitrary, and that they determine the bounds of sense.
Routledge
Whiting, Daniel
c0847bb4-963e-470d-92a2-5c8aae5d5aef
Pfisterer, Christoph
Rathgeb, Nicole
Schmidt, Eva
Whiting, Daniel
c0847bb4-963e-470d-92a2-5c8aae5d5aef
Pfisterer, Christoph
Rathgeb, Nicole
Schmidt, Eva

Whiting, Daniel (2022) Wittgenstein's later nonsense. In, Pfisterer, Christoph, Rathgeb, Nicole and Schmidt, Eva (eds.) Wittgenstein and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Hans-Johann Glock. 1st ed. Routledge.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

According to an influential reading of his later philosophy, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense can result from combining expressions in ways prohibited by the rules to which their use is subject. According to another influential reading, the later Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense only ever results from privation—that is, from a failure to assign a meaning to one or more of the relevant expressions. This chapter challenges Glock’s defence of the view that the later Wittgenstein allows for combinatorial nonsense. In doing so, it defends a version of the privation view. According to it, Wittgenstein thinks that nonsense results, not so much from a failure to assign a meaning to an expression, as a failure to use an expression in a way that has a point or purpose. As the chapter shows, this interpretation is consistent with prominent themes in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, such as that meaning and explanation are coordinate notions, that for a word to have a meaning is for there to be a rule-governed practice of using it, that the rules of the practice are arbitrary, and that they determine the bounds of sense.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 28 October 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472478
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472478
PURE UUID: 09432e46-06e4-483d-bf86-f380129868c0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Dec 2022 17:41
Last modified: 26 May 2023 16:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: Daniel Whiting
Editor: Christoph Pfisterer
Editor: Nicole Rathgeb
Editor: Eva Schmidt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×