Phylogenetic analysis of the Archaeocidaridae and Palaeozoic Miocidaridae (Echinodermata, Echinoidea) and the origin of crown group echinoids
Phylogenetic analysis of the Archaeocidaridae and Palaeozoic Miocidaridae (Echinodermata, Echinoidea) and the origin of crown group echinoids
The archaeocidarids comprise the most derived stem group echinoids and have long been regarded as closely related to the crown group. The fossil record of echinoids in the Palaeozoic is, however, poor, so details surrounding the initial divergence of crown group echinoids are not well constrained. In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships of the most derived stem group and most basal crown group echinoids, a phylogenetic analysis was undertaken of the Archaeocidaridae, including the genera Nortonechinus, Devonocidaris, Lepidocidaris, Polytaxicidaris and Archaeocidaris and the Palaeozoic miocidarid cidaroids from the genus Eotiaris. We found that Archaeocidaris appears to be paraphyletic with respect to crown group echinoids. Furthermore, we mapped character evolution along our phylogeny and found that the diversification of archaeocidarids and miocidarids may be linked to large-scale macroecological changes taking place in the late Palaeozoic, including increasing predation pressure and echinoid encrustation by epibionts. We compared the stratigraphical distribution of archaeocidarid and miocidarid occurrences to our resulting phylogenies, and found that the fit of our cladograms to the stratigraphic record of archaeocidarid occurrences is worse than other echinoid groups, supporting the idea that the imbricate plated archaeocidarids have a poor fossil record. In the course of carrying out these analyses, we also felt it necessary to describe a new species of Archaeocidaris, Archaeocidaris ivanovi sp. nov. We also provide novel descriptions and interpretations for Devonocidaris primaevus, Archaeocidaris brownwoodensis, Archaeocidaris apheles and revise the synonymy of Archaeocidaris legrandensis and ?Eotiaris meurevillensis, which may be a crown group echinoid.
217 - 249
Thompson, Jeffrey R.
d2c9b7bb-3e33-4918-97c8-0c36e7af30a4
Mirantsev, Georgy V.
118d0fdf-0d9b-4e69-b0e6-4d9971b8a3fe
Petsios, Elizabeth
a5cdbcb2-f8b8-4ee4-8e75-8fa9271a08d6
Bottjer, David J.
bfaed1cd-cbf2-4cae-9812-5dfdf44b3f0b
25 April 2020
Thompson, Jeffrey R.
d2c9b7bb-3e33-4918-97c8-0c36e7af30a4
Mirantsev, Georgy V.
118d0fdf-0d9b-4e69-b0e6-4d9971b8a3fe
Petsios, Elizabeth
a5cdbcb2-f8b8-4ee4-8e75-8fa9271a08d6
Bottjer, David J.
bfaed1cd-cbf2-4cae-9812-5dfdf44b3f0b
Thompson, Jeffrey R., Mirantsev, Georgy V., Petsios, Elizabeth and Bottjer, David J.
(2020)
Phylogenetic analysis of the Archaeocidaridae and Palaeozoic Miocidaridae (Echinodermata, Echinoidea) and the origin of crown group echinoids.
Papers in Palaeontology, 6 (2), .
(doi:10.1002/spp2.1280).
Abstract
The archaeocidarids comprise the most derived stem group echinoids and have long been regarded as closely related to the crown group. The fossil record of echinoids in the Palaeozoic is, however, poor, so details surrounding the initial divergence of crown group echinoids are not well constrained. In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships of the most derived stem group and most basal crown group echinoids, a phylogenetic analysis was undertaken of the Archaeocidaridae, including the genera Nortonechinus, Devonocidaris, Lepidocidaris, Polytaxicidaris and Archaeocidaris and the Palaeozoic miocidarid cidaroids from the genus Eotiaris. We found that Archaeocidaris appears to be paraphyletic with respect to crown group echinoids. Furthermore, we mapped character evolution along our phylogeny and found that the diversification of archaeocidarids and miocidarids may be linked to large-scale macroecological changes taking place in the late Palaeozoic, including increasing predation pressure and echinoid encrustation by epibionts. We compared the stratigraphical distribution of archaeocidarid and miocidarid occurrences to our resulting phylogenies, and found that the fit of our cladograms to the stratigraphic record of archaeocidarid occurrences is worse than other echinoid groups, supporting the idea that the imbricate plated archaeocidarids have a poor fossil record. In the course of carrying out these analyses, we also felt it necessary to describe a new species of Archaeocidaris, Archaeocidaris ivanovi sp. nov. We also provide novel descriptions and interpretations for Devonocidaris primaevus, Archaeocidaris brownwoodensis, Archaeocidaris apheles and revise the synonymy of Archaeocidaris legrandensis and ?Eotiaris meurevillensis, which may be a crown group echinoid.
Text
Papers in Palaeontology - 2019 - Thompson - Phylogenetic analysis of the Archaeocidaridae and Palaeozoic Miocidaridae
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 December 2018
Published date: 25 April 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 472586
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472586
ISSN: 2056-2802
PURE UUID: ec180acb-fbd8-485e-b9e3-286bac9e1090
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Dec 2022 17:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jeffrey R. Thompson
Author:
Georgy V. Mirantsev
Author:
Elizabeth Petsios
Author:
David J. Bottjer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics