The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation: the patient’s perspective

Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation: the patient’s perspective
Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation: the patient’s perspective

Purpose: there is currently no consensus regarding what outcome domains to measure following lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Prosthetic users have a unique insight into important outcome domains, little is currently known about their critical viewpoint. 

Materials and methods: a total of 37 participants who underwent lower limb amputation in the last five years were recruited from UK limb fitting centres and social media. Data were collected using focus groups and interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. 

Results: five themes were identified. 1) The ability to participate in important activities, 2) how participants were able to undertake these activities, i.e., independently, with ease, safely and with minimal equipment. 3) A comfortable, easy-to-use prosthesis, 4) the importance of managing pain and finally, 5) adjusting and accepting their new normal. These five themes, or outcome domains, did not exist in isolation, but appeared to interact with each other, contributing to, or inhibiting the participant’s holistic sense of recovery. 

Conclusions: understanding important outcome domains that define what recovery means to people following amputation can help to inform domain consensus, as well as direct the focus of rehabilitation. Domain consensus would guide the selection of measurement tools that evaluate prosthetic interventions in a meaningful way.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION There is currently no consensus around which outcome domains should be measured following prosthetic rehabilitation. Outcome domains of importance from a patient’s perspective focus on participation in important activities, prosthesis comfort, pain management, and acceptance of their new normal. Identifying these domains can help direct the focus of rehabilitation as well as inform outcome measurement practice. The interrelated nature of these domains suggests the need for a physical and psychosocial multi-domain approach to outcome measurement in prosthetic rehabilitation, with patient priorities at its centre.

Outcome, amputation, experience, meaningful, measurement, prosthetic, qualitative, recovery
0963-8288
3937–3950
Ostler, Chantel Marie
c5e34ffb-7763-4fc0-98a4-128d1ed5d967
Donovan-Hall, Maggie
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Ostler, Chantel Marie
c5e34ffb-7763-4fc0-98a4-128d1ed5d967
Donovan-Hall, Maggie
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72

Ostler, Chantel Marie, Donovan-Hall, Maggie, Dickinson, Alex and Metcalf, Cheryl (2022) Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation: the patient’s perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 45 (23), 3937–3950. (doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2138989).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: there is currently no consensus regarding what outcome domains to measure following lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Prosthetic users have a unique insight into important outcome domains, little is currently known about their critical viewpoint. 

Materials and methods: a total of 37 participants who underwent lower limb amputation in the last five years were recruited from UK limb fitting centres and social media. Data were collected using focus groups and interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. 

Results: five themes were identified. 1) The ability to participate in important activities, 2) how participants were able to undertake these activities, i.e., independently, with ease, safely and with minimal equipment. 3) A comfortable, easy-to-use prosthesis, 4) the importance of managing pain and finally, 5) adjusting and accepting their new normal. These five themes, or outcome domains, did not exist in isolation, but appeared to interact with each other, contributing to, or inhibiting the participant’s holistic sense of recovery. 

Conclusions: understanding important outcome domains that define what recovery means to people following amputation can help to inform domain consensus, as well as direct the focus of rehabilitation. Domain consensus would guide the selection of measurement tools that evaluate prosthetic interventions in a meaningful way.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION There is currently no consensus around which outcome domains should be measured following prosthetic rehabilitation. Outcome domains of importance from a patient’s perspective focus on participation in important activities, prosthesis comfort, pain management, and acceptance of their new normal. Identifying these domains can help direct the focus of rehabilitation as well as inform outcome measurement practice. The interrelated nature of these domains suggests the need for a physical and psychosocial multi-domain approach to outcome measurement in prosthetic rehabilitation, with patient priorities at its centre.

Text
Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation the patient s perspective - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2022
Published date: 12 November 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors thank the public research partners and all participants of the research for sharing their experiences. The authors also acknowledge and thank the project funders the British Association of Chartered Physiotherapist in Limb Absence Rehabilitation (BACPAR), the Institute for Life Sciences at the University of Southampton, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)/National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Challenges Research Fund [grant EP/R014213/1], and the Royal Academy of Engineering [RAEng grant RF/130].
Keywords: Outcome, amputation, experience, meaningful, measurement, prosthetic, qualitative, recovery

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472652
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472652
ISSN: 0963-8288
PURE UUID: 69c8e319-dd67-43ab-8113-77b79adca866
ORCID for Alex Dickinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1944
ORCID for Cheryl Metcalf: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-6066

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Dec 2022 17:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chantel Marie Ostler
Author: Alex Dickinson ORCID iD
Author: Cheryl Metcalf ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×