The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Beyond compliance: Good citizenship during the COVID-19 pandemic

Beyond compliance: Good citizenship during the COVID-19 pandemic
Beyond compliance: Good citizenship during the COVID-19 pandemic

In the UK, discussion of good citizenship during the COVID-19 pandemic largely focused on compliance and non-compliance with government rules. In this paper, we offer an alternative point of focus. Pandemic governance proceeded not only through rules/morality, but also through freedom/ethics. Good citizenship, therefore, involved practical reasoning in response to situations. We demonstrate this using diaries and other forms of writing collected by Mass Observation during the first six months of the pandemic. Responses to government rules and guidance varied by situation. Many people found governance through freedom/ethics confusing and burdensome. Faced with ethical dilemmas, they managed risks and responsibilities by deliberating, weighing justifications, and sometimes falling back on rules of thumb or heuristics. Discussion of good citizenship during future emergencies would benefit from a greater focus on situations, dilemmas, and justifications.

COVID-19 pandemic, Mass Observation, United Kingdom, citizenship, responsibility, risk
0020-2754
Clarke, Nicholas
4ed65752-5210-4f9e-aeff-9188520510e8
Barnett, Clive
b1f2f557-2f7b-4c99-8aec-0b37a57db0c8
Clarke, Nicholas
4ed65752-5210-4f9e-aeff-9188520510e8
Barnett, Clive
b1f2f557-2f7b-4c99-8aec-0b37a57db0c8

Clarke, Nicholas and Barnett, Clive (2022) Beyond compliance: Good citizenship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. (doi:10.1111/tran.12587).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In the UK, discussion of good citizenship during the COVID-19 pandemic largely focused on compliance and non-compliance with government rules. In this paper, we offer an alternative point of focus. Pandemic governance proceeded not only through rules/morality, but also through freedom/ethics. Good citizenship, therefore, involved practical reasoning in response to situations. We demonstrate this using diaries and other forms of writing collected by Mass Observation during the first six months of the pandemic. Responses to government rules and guidance varied by situation. Many people found governance through freedom/ethics confusing and burdensome. Faced with ethical dilemmas, they managed risks and responsibilities by deliberating, weighing justifications, and sometimes falling back on rules of thumb or heuristics. Discussion of good citizenship during future emergencies would benefit from a greater focus on situations, dilemmas, and justifications.

Text
Trans Inst British Geog - 2022 - Clarke - Beyond compliance Good citizenship during the COVID‐19 pandemic - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (386kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 October 2022
Published date: 11 November 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: We thank the British Academy for funding the research (Special Research Awards: COVID‐19, project COV19\200422, ‘Learning to Live with Risk and Responsibility: Understanding Popular Responses to COVID‐19’). We thank the Mass Observation Archive for providing access and permissions, and especially Jessica Scantlebury and Kirsty Pattrick for their assistance and expertise. We also thank the editor, Matt Sparke, and three anonymous reviewers for suggesting revisions to an earlier version of the paper. Publisher Copyright: The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG). © 2022 The Authors. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers).
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, Mass Observation, United Kingdom, citizenship, responsibility, risk

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472685
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472685
ISSN: 0020-2754
PURE UUID: 20144f61-51c5-4e9e-9a2f-66efb5996e81
ORCID for Nicholas Clarke: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-9849

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Dec 2022 17:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicholas Clarke ORCID iD
Author: Clive Barnett

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×