The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: an empirical analysis

Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: an empirical analysis
Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: an empirical analysis

Postponement has been recognized as a strategy to manage uncertainties in demand. Its performance however depends on various prerequisites. Numerous technical factors that influence postponement such as product modularity and process redesign have been widely studied. Notwithstanding, the effect of external factors on postponement have been paid much less attention. This paper addresses the external factors which affect postponement application, and in particular, concentrates on the relationship between supplier flexibility and postponement implementation. Four constructs of flexibility and three constructs of postponement - namely volume flexibility, mix flexibility, new product design flexibility, product modification flexibility, manufacturing postponement, ordering postponement and product design postponement - are identified, and measured variables for each construct are extracted from the literature. Supported by a theoretical ground, built based on the literature, the positive relationships among supplier flexibility and postponement constructs are then tested through structural equation modeling (SEM) using empirical data from a sample of 219 manufacturing SMEs in one country. The results indicate that the supplier impacts on postponement implementation for the buying firm are not identical for all types of postponements and supplier flexibilities. While manufacturing postponement and ordering postponement are supported by supplier volume and mix flexibilities, design postponement is only related with product modification flexibility. These findings enhance the postponement knowledge with respect to external influencing factors from a general level to a more precise, specific level. The implications of the research outcomes are discussed and directions for future research are provided.

Postponement, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Supplier flexibility
0925-5273
170-183
Saghiri, Soroosh S.
6bfd600c-bdd1-4dde-9f33-d3f138e85e9d
Barnes, Stuart J.
e745df0d-e262-4f25-a743-9e1b77d0e560
Saghiri, Soroosh S.
6bfd600c-bdd1-4dde-9f33-d3f138e85e9d
Barnes, Stuart J.
e745df0d-e262-4f25-a743-9e1b77d0e560

Saghiri, Soroosh S. and Barnes, Stuart J. (2016) Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 170-183. (doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.015).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Postponement has been recognized as a strategy to manage uncertainties in demand. Its performance however depends on various prerequisites. Numerous technical factors that influence postponement such as product modularity and process redesign have been widely studied. Notwithstanding, the effect of external factors on postponement have been paid much less attention. This paper addresses the external factors which affect postponement application, and in particular, concentrates on the relationship between supplier flexibility and postponement implementation. Four constructs of flexibility and three constructs of postponement - namely volume flexibility, mix flexibility, new product design flexibility, product modification flexibility, manufacturing postponement, ordering postponement and product design postponement - are identified, and measured variables for each construct are extracted from the literature. Supported by a theoretical ground, built based on the literature, the positive relationships among supplier flexibility and postponement constructs are then tested through structural equation modeling (SEM) using empirical data from a sample of 219 manufacturing SMEs in one country. The results indicate that the supplier impacts on postponement implementation for the buying firm are not identical for all types of postponements and supplier flexibilities. While manufacturing postponement and ordering postponement are supported by supplier volume and mix flexibilities, design postponement is only related with product modification flexibility. These findings enhance the postponement knowledge with respect to external influencing factors from a general level to a more precise, specific level. The implications of the research outcomes are discussed and directions for future research are provided.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 December 2015
Published date: March 2016
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Postponement, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Supplier flexibility

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472784
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472784
ISSN: 0925-5273
PURE UUID: 763bc11d-0eb9-426d-9c2d-e7d12d51ab45
ORCID for Soroosh S. Saghiri: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-3207

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Dec 2022 17:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Soroosh S. Saghiri ORCID iD
Author: Stuart J. Barnes

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×