The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Osteoporosis treatment in Austria-assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk

Osteoporosis treatment in Austria-assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk
Osteoporosis treatment in Austria-assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk

Summary: The adoption of the management pathway proposed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), UK applied using the Austrian FRAX® tool in a referral population of Austrian women categorises 22–29% of women age 40 years or more eligible for treatment of whom 28–34% are classified at very high risk. Purpose: The aim of this study is to provide a reference document for the further development of existing guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in Austria, considering FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk. Methods: The model development was based on two Austrian hospital referral cohorts. Baseline information was collected to compute the 10-year probability (using the Austrian FRAX model) of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture both with and without the inclusion of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Assessment thresholds for BMD testing were defined, as well as intervention thresholds. In addition, thresholds that characterise men and women at high and very high fracture risk were established. The management pathway followed that currently recommended by the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Results: The two cohorts comprised a total of 1306 women and men with a mean age of 66.7 years. Slightly more than 50% were eligible for treatment by virtue of a prior fragility fracture. In those women without a prior fracture, 22% (n = 120) were eligible for treatment based on MOF probabilities. Of these, 28% (n = 33) were found to be at very high risk. When both MOF and hip fracture probabilities were used to characterise risk, 164 women without a prior fracture were eligible for treatment (29%). Of these, 34% (n = 56) were found to be at very high risk. Fewer men without prior fracture were eligible for treatment compared with women. Conclusion: The management pathway as currently outlined is expected to reduce inequalities in patient management. The characterisation of very high risk may aid in the identification of patients suitable for treatment with osteoanabolic agents.

Austria, FRAX, High risk, Intervention threshold, Very high risk
1862-3522
Dimai, Hans P.
f744f03c-a25d-41f1-af6f-7029ce47cf8c
Johansson, Helena
04f12338-4dd1-437b-b9bc-e0884130c215
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Lorentzon, Mattias
9d78ed25-2b0c-46c5-a2db-a8b246af0956
Liu, Enwu
08027c15-9e71-44bb-9623-3081f5f6492d
Vandenput, Liesbeth
0910d143-4b58-4579-82b0-3810272f1814
Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid
daf6818f-5194-483c-8c46-eefb594f9cf2
Pietschmann, Peter
5004e05a-0f0f-4436-adf3-42719808eeb9
Muschitz, Christian
bdfa3a5c-1295-47bf-af2b-b5c32d37703b
McCloskey, Eugene V.
2f057a16-3d4e-4597-80c7-6ce47f969c78
Kanis, John A.
f1621d8d-8afb-4d97-9679-2165d88a344d
Dimai, Hans P.
f744f03c-a25d-41f1-af6f-7029ce47cf8c
Johansson, Helena
04f12338-4dd1-437b-b9bc-e0884130c215
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Lorentzon, Mattias
9d78ed25-2b0c-46c5-a2db-a8b246af0956
Liu, Enwu
08027c15-9e71-44bb-9623-3081f5f6492d
Vandenput, Liesbeth
0910d143-4b58-4579-82b0-3810272f1814
Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid
daf6818f-5194-483c-8c46-eefb594f9cf2
Pietschmann, Peter
5004e05a-0f0f-4436-adf3-42719808eeb9
Muschitz, Christian
bdfa3a5c-1295-47bf-af2b-b5c32d37703b
McCloskey, Eugene V.
2f057a16-3d4e-4597-80c7-6ce47f969c78
Kanis, John A.
f1621d8d-8afb-4d97-9679-2165d88a344d

Dimai, Hans P., Johansson, Helena, Harvey, Nicholas C., Lorentzon, Mattias, Liu, Enwu, Vandenput, Liesbeth, Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid, Pietschmann, Peter, Muschitz, Christian, McCloskey, Eugene V. and Kanis, John A. (2022) Osteoporosis treatment in Austria-assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk. Archives of Osteoporosis, 17 (1), [141]. (doi:10.1007/s11657-022-01175-w).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Summary: The adoption of the management pathway proposed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), UK applied using the Austrian FRAX® tool in a referral population of Austrian women categorises 22–29% of women age 40 years or more eligible for treatment of whom 28–34% are classified at very high risk. Purpose: The aim of this study is to provide a reference document for the further development of existing guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in Austria, considering FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk. Methods: The model development was based on two Austrian hospital referral cohorts. Baseline information was collected to compute the 10-year probability (using the Austrian FRAX model) of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture both with and without the inclusion of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Assessment thresholds for BMD testing were defined, as well as intervention thresholds. In addition, thresholds that characterise men and women at high and very high fracture risk were established. The management pathway followed that currently recommended by the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Results: The two cohorts comprised a total of 1306 women and men with a mean age of 66.7 years. Slightly more than 50% were eligible for treatment by virtue of a prior fragility fracture. In those women without a prior fracture, 22% (n = 120) were eligible for treatment based on MOF probabilities. Of these, 28% (n = 33) were found to be at very high risk. When both MOF and hip fracture probabilities were used to characterise risk, 164 women without a prior fracture were eligible for treatment (29%). Of these, 34% (n = 56) were found to be at very high risk. Fewer men without prior fracture were eligible for treatment compared with women. Conclusion: The management pathway as currently outlined is expected to reduce inequalities in patient management. The characterisation of very high risk may aid in the identification of patients suitable for treatment with osteoanabolic agents.

Text
s11657-022-01175-w - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (723kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 October 2022
Published date: 11 October 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: A Fahrleitner-Pammer has received research grants from Amgen and Roche, and lecture fees from Amgen, Alexion, EliLilly, Gedeon Richter, Fresenius, Stada, UCB, all outside the presented work. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
Keywords: Austria, FRAX, High risk, Intervention threshold, Very high risk

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 472834
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472834
ISSN: 1862-3522
PURE UUID: 4efd8e05-867c-4d1e-823b-1f9befc4ed5b
ORCID for Nicholas C. Harvey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Dec 2022 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Hans P. Dimai
Author: Helena Johansson
Author: Mattias Lorentzon
Author: Enwu Liu
Author: Liesbeth Vandenput
Author: Astrid Fahrleitner-Pammer
Author: Peter Pietschmann
Author: Christian Muschitz
Author: Eugene V. McCloskey
Author: John A. Kanis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×