Temporal evolution in quality of life following melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Vigneswaran, Ganesh, Woodcock, Pippa, Gibson, Tom, Patel, Shian, Adil, Maryam, Wheater, Matthew, Karydis, Ioannis, Gupta, Sanjay, Stedman, Brian and Modi, Sachin (2022) Temporal evolution in quality of life following melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40 (16). (doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e21520).

Abstract

Background: recent studies have demonstrated a clear survival benefit of melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) for liver metastases from ocular melanoma (mUM). Importantly, the survival benefit relating to each treatment cycle must be carefully balanced with changes in patient Quality of Life. We contribute our single centre findings on the temporal change in the quality of life after M-PHP therapy.

Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of the change in quality of life (QoL) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) with mUM patients receiving M‐PHP at our institutions (n = 13). The FACT-G score which comprises physical (PWB), social (SWB), emotional (EWB) and functional (FWB) wellbeing were measured pre-procedure and at day 1, day of discharge, 7, 14 and 28 days after M-PHP therapy. Paired t-test was used to assess for any significant change in each QoL domain.

Results: the baseline FACT-G score was 93.4 out of 108 +/- 14.7 (mean +/- std). Quality of life scoring significantly decreased immediately after the procedure (day 1; 84.8 +/- 13.1, p = 0.01) and gradually improved over time, with no significant difference in total score by the day of discharge; 88.7 +/- 13.7, c.f baseline p = 0.22). By day 28, there was a trend for overall improved QoL (96.6 +/-9.3, p = 0.25). Sub-score analysis revealed that by day 28 there was a statistically significant improvement in EWB (p = 0.02), a trend towards improved scores in PWB and SWB domains. FWB was slightly below baseline by day 28 (23.8 vs 23.2).

Conclusions: quality of life following M-PHP decreases immediately after therapy and is not significantly different from baseline by the day of discharge. By day 28 there is a trend towards improved overall quality of life. This study could provide the basis for determining the optimal time between treatment cycles.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: Ganesh Vigneswaran

Download statistics