The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Juvenile skeletogenesis in anciently diverged sea urchin clades

Juvenile skeletogenesis in anciently diverged sea urchin clades
Juvenile skeletogenesis in anciently diverged sea urchin clades
Mechanistic understanding of evolutionary divergence in animal body plans devolves from analysis of those developmental processes that, in forms descendant from a common ancestor, are responsible for their morphological differences. The last common ancestor of the two extant subclasses of sea urchins, i.e., euechinoids and cidaroids, existed well before the Permian/Triassic extinction (252 mya). Subsequent evolutionary divergence of these clades offers in principle a rare opportunity to solve the developmental regulatory events underlying a defined evolutionary divergence process. Thus (i) there is an excellent and fairly dense (if yet incompletely analyzed) fossil record; (ii) cladistically confined features of the skeletal structures of modern euechinoid and cidaroid sea urchins are preserved in fossils of ancestral forms; (iii) euechinoids and cidaroids are among current laboratory model systems in molecular developmental biology (here Strongylocentrotus purpuratus [Sp] and Eucidaris tribuloides [Et]); (iv) skeletogenic specification in sea urchins is uncommonly well understood at the causal level of interactions of regulatory genes with one another, and with known skeletogenic effector genes, providing a ready arsenal of available molecular tools. Here we focus on differences in test and perignathic girdle skeletal morphology that distinguish all modern euechinoid from all modern cidaroid sea urchins. We demonstrate distinct canonical test and girdle morphologies in juveniles of both species by use of SEM and X-ray microtomography. Among the sharply distinct morphological features of these clades are the internal skeletal structures of the perignathic girdle to which attach homologous muscles utilized for retraction and protraction of Aristotles׳ lantern and its teeth. We demonstrate that these structures develop de novo between one and four weeks after metamorphosis. In order to study the underlying developmental processes, a method of section whole mount in situ hybridization was adapted. This method displays current gene expression in the developing test and perignathic girdle skeletal elements of both Sp and Et juveniles. Active, specific expression of the sm37 biomineralization gene in these muscle attachment structures accompanies morphogenetic development of these clade-specific features in juveniles of both species. Skeletogenesis at these clade-specific muscle attachment structures displays molecular earmarks of the well understood embryonic skeletogenic GRN: thus the upstream regulatory gene alx1 and the gene encoding the vegfR signaling receptor are both expressed at the sites where they are formed. This work opens the way to analysis of the alternative spatial specification processes that were installed at the evolutionary divergence of the two extant subclasses of sea urchins.
0012-1606
148-158
Gao, Feng
b70fc7ee-1c00-4b32-aa1a-272e603a3add
Thompson, Jeffrey R.
d2c9b7bb-3e33-4918-97c8-0c36e7af30a4
Petsios, Elizabeth
a5cdbcb2-f8b8-4ee4-8e75-8fa9271a08d6
Erkenbrack, Eric
5e52102d-6135-4231-a33f-4933dc070f19
Moats, Rex A.
e9ebba8b-246b-401b-ab91-96d71224024b
Bottjer, David J.
bfaed1cd-cbf2-4cae-9812-5dfdf44b3f0b
Davidson, Eric H.
197d8a8a-096c-478c-90b6-f93b5a2d5aa4
Gao, Feng
b70fc7ee-1c00-4b32-aa1a-272e603a3add
Thompson, Jeffrey R.
d2c9b7bb-3e33-4918-97c8-0c36e7af30a4
Petsios, Elizabeth
a5cdbcb2-f8b8-4ee4-8e75-8fa9271a08d6
Erkenbrack, Eric
5e52102d-6135-4231-a33f-4933dc070f19
Moats, Rex A.
e9ebba8b-246b-401b-ab91-96d71224024b
Bottjer, David J.
bfaed1cd-cbf2-4cae-9812-5dfdf44b3f0b
Davidson, Eric H.
197d8a8a-096c-478c-90b6-f93b5a2d5aa4

Gao, Feng, Thompson, Jeffrey R., Petsios, Elizabeth, Erkenbrack, Eric, Moats, Rex A., Bottjer, David J. and Davidson, Eric H. (2015) Juvenile skeletogenesis in anciently diverged sea urchin clades. Developmental Biology, 400 (1), 148-158. (doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.01.017).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Mechanistic understanding of evolutionary divergence in animal body plans devolves from analysis of those developmental processes that, in forms descendant from a common ancestor, are responsible for their morphological differences. The last common ancestor of the two extant subclasses of sea urchins, i.e., euechinoids and cidaroids, existed well before the Permian/Triassic extinction (252 mya). Subsequent evolutionary divergence of these clades offers in principle a rare opportunity to solve the developmental regulatory events underlying a defined evolutionary divergence process. Thus (i) there is an excellent and fairly dense (if yet incompletely analyzed) fossil record; (ii) cladistically confined features of the skeletal structures of modern euechinoid and cidaroid sea urchins are preserved in fossils of ancestral forms; (iii) euechinoids and cidaroids are among current laboratory model systems in molecular developmental biology (here Strongylocentrotus purpuratus [Sp] and Eucidaris tribuloides [Et]); (iv) skeletogenic specification in sea urchins is uncommonly well understood at the causal level of interactions of regulatory genes with one another, and with known skeletogenic effector genes, providing a ready arsenal of available molecular tools. Here we focus on differences in test and perignathic girdle skeletal morphology that distinguish all modern euechinoid from all modern cidaroid sea urchins. We demonstrate distinct canonical test and girdle morphologies in juveniles of both species by use of SEM and X-ray microtomography. Among the sharply distinct morphological features of these clades are the internal skeletal structures of the perignathic girdle to which attach homologous muscles utilized for retraction and protraction of Aristotles׳ lantern and its teeth. We demonstrate that these structures develop de novo between one and four weeks after metamorphosis. In order to study the underlying developmental processes, a method of section whole mount in situ hybridization was adapted. This method displays current gene expression in the developing test and perignathic girdle skeletal elements of both Sp and Et juveniles. Active, specific expression of the sm37 biomineralization gene in these muscle attachment structures accompanies morphogenetic development of these clade-specific features in juveniles of both species. Skeletogenesis at these clade-specific muscle attachment structures displays molecular earmarks of the well understood embryonic skeletogenic GRN: thus the upstream regulatory gene alx1 and the gene encoding the vegfR signaling receptor are both expressed at the sites where they are formed. This work opens the way to analysis of the alternative spatial specification processes that were installed at the evolutionary divergence of the two extant subclasses of sea urchins.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 April 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473103
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473103
ISSN: 0012-1606
PURE UUID: 94f9562b-e9c8-493d-aa35-55ba562bced7
ORCID for Jeffrey R. Thompson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-172X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jan 2023 18:05
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Feng Gao
Author: Jeffrey R. Thompson ORCID iD
Author: Elizabeth Petsios
Author: Eric Erkenbrack
Author: Rex A. Moats
Author: David J. Bottjer
Author: Eric H. Davidson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×