The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the research activities of UK ophthalmologists

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the research activities of UK ophthalmologists
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the research activities of UK ophthalmologists

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted negatively on many areas of biomedical research and there is concern that academic recovery will take several years. This survey aimed to define the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK ophthalmologists’ research activities and understand the implications for recovery. 

Methods: An online survey comprising multiple choice and free-text questions was designed, piloted and then distributed to Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) members in January 2021. Respondent characteristics, research expectations and experiences through the pandemic were captured. Descriptive and comparative statistics were applied to quantitative data alongside content analysis of qualitative data. 

Results: In total, 148 respondents (3.7% of RCOphth membership) comprised 46 trainees (31.1%), 97 consultants (65.5%) and 5 SAS doctors (3.4%); 54 had clinical-academic roles (36.5%) and 65/94 (69.1%) ophthalmologists with fully clinical posts identified as research-active. Of 114 research-active respondents, 104 (91.2%) reported an impact on their research from COVID-19; negative impacts included loss of research time (n = 69), research delays (n = 96) and funding shortfalls (n = 63). Content analysis identified five common themes; type of research activity, clinical demands, institutional challenges, COVID-19 alignment and work-life balance. 

Conclusions: UK ophthalmology research has been adversely impacted by the pandemic. A substantial proportion of UK ophthalmologists are research active, but 20.4% of those surveyed felt that the pandemic had made research less attractive. Strategic steps must be taken to nurture UK ophthalmologists’ engagement with research, especially for those who currently do no research, if the profession is to align itself with the Government vision of ‘Research for All’.

0950-222X
Hogg, H. D.J.
551043a3-4c42-4371-bcb7-dd6746b00ff1
Low, L.
a6686acc-764a-47c1-8fc5-f08d8a4617c3
Self, J. E.
0f6efc58-ae24-4667-b8d6-6fafa849e389
Allen, Louise
a7dfbc33-bc22-4e7d-b31b-45acae15c2ef
Atan, Denize
ee27dcf4-671c-4c31-b521-99f9db4dee21
Bourne, Rupert R.A.
1223df0e-d562-48b6-aaa6-aeba42664b61
Dick, Andrew D.
3663310f-576f-459a-aa3e-7a249ab33e28
Foster, Paul J.
2ce65475-8311-4833-98b2-2011b76b9147
Gale, Richard P.
32d42683-5d9e-4a4e-808f-e971fe807ebc
Hammond, Christopher J.
a0ca3e05-61b7-41c4-bfed-b589aab06308
Megaw, Roly
4e44f543-e923-4d8f-87fb-dc2bf86b6243
Moosajee, Mariya
f2fa70ae-0624-40bf-b071-2bdabcb58de9
Sivaprasad, Sobha
7cd590d6-18f0-4ae1-8ace-4b35833c2f03
Rahi, J. S.
8bd9ef0b-67b5-4b5b-a301-d43c4bd45cc5
Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ Academic and Research Subcommittee
Hogg, H. D.J.
551043a3-4c42-4371-bcb7-dd6746b00ff1
Low, L.
a6686acc-764a-47c1-8fc5-f08d8a4617c3
Self, J. E.
0f6efc58-ae24-4667-b8d6-6fafa849e389
Allen, Louise
a7dfbc33-bc22-4e7d-b31b-45acae15c2ef
Atan, Denize
ee27dcf4-671c-4c31-b521-99f9db4dee21
Bourne, Rupert R.A.
1223df0e-d562-48b6-aaa6-aeba42664b61
Dick, Andrew D.
3663310f-576f-459a-aa3e-7a249ab33e28
Foster, Paul J.
2ce65475-8311-4833-98b2-2011b76b9147
Gale, Richard P.
32d42683-5d9e-4a4e-808f-e971fe807ebc
Hammond, Christopher J.
a0ca3e05-61b7-41c4-bfed-b589aab06308
Megaw, Roly
4e44f543-e923-4d8f-87fb-dc2bf86b6243
Moosajee, Mariya
f2fa70ae-0624-40bf-b071-2bdabcb58de9
Sivaprasad, Sobha
7cd590d6-18f0-4ae1-8ace-4b35833c2f03
Rahi, J. S.
8bd9ef0b-67b5-4b5b-a301-d43c4bd45cc5

Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ Academic and Research Subcommittee (2022) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the research activities of UK ophthalmologists. Eye (Basingstoke). (doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02293-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted negatively on many areas of biomedical research and there is concern that academic recovery will take several years. This survey aimed to define the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK ophthalmologists’ research activities and understand the implications for recovery. 

Methods: An online survey comprising multiple choice and free-text questions was designed, piloted and then distributed to Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) members in January 2021. Respondent characteristics, research expectations and experiences through the pandemic were captured. Descriptive and comparative statistics were applied to quantitative data alongside content analysis of qualitative data. 

Results: In total, 148 respondents (3.7% of RCOphth membership) comprised 46 trainees (31.1%), 97 consultants (65.5%) and 5 SAS doctors (3.4%); 54 had clinical-academic roles (36.5%) and 65/94 (69.1%) ophthalmologists with fully clinical posts identified as research-active. Of 114 research-active respondents, 104 (91.2%) reported an impact on their research from COVID-19; negative impacts included loss of research time (n = 69), research delays (n = 96) and funding shortfalls (n = 63). Content analysis identified five common themes; type of research activity, clinical demands, institutional challenges, COVID-19 alignment and work-life balance. 

Conclusions: UK ophthalmology research has been adversely impacted by the pandemic. A substantial proportion of UK ophthalmologists are research active, but 20.4% of those surveyed felt that the pandemic had made research less attractive. Strategic steps must be taken to nurture UK ophthalmologists’ engagement with research, especially for those who currently do no research, if the profession is to align itself with the Government vision of ‘Research for All’.

Text
s41433-022-02293-y - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (693kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 October 2022
Additional Information: © 2022. The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473270
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473270
ISSN: 0950-222X
PURE UUID: abeb96a8-4386-4776-8881-52f7ea8dce12
ORCID for J. E. Self: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-9963

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Jan 2023 17:37
Last modified: 11 May 2024 01:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: H. D.J. Hogg
Author: L. Low
Author: J. E. Self ORCID iD
Author: Louise Allen
Author: Denize Atan
Author: Rupert R.A. Bourne
Author: Andrew D. Dick
Author: Paul J. Foster
Author: Richard P. Gale
Author: Christopher J. Hammond
Author: Roly Megaw
Author: Mariya Moosajee
Author: Sobha Sivaprasad
Author: J. S. Rahi
Corporate Author: Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ Academic and Research Subcommittee

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×