Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach
Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach
 
  In order to evaluate the feasibility of a selective screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) within an urban setting and assess its impact on the expected increase in workload for the local hospital(s), a population based, prospective study was performed. A total of 4823 men aged 65 years were invited for ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta between January 1993 and April 1997 as part of a general practice-based aneurysm screening programme covering two districts with a general hospital each. All examinations were carried out by senior radiographers using a portable B mode grey scale machine and a 3.5 MHz curvi-linear array probe. Patients with a maximum aortic diameter of over 3 cm were annually recalled, those with over 4 cm were referred to hospital for an out-patient's appointment. Those with AAA greater than 5 cm were considered for surgery. Of those approached, 3497 (72.5%) took part in the study, 1206 (25%) did not attend and 120 (2.5%) were excluded by their general practitioners (GPs) on medical grounds. Of the men taking part, 3130 (89.5%) had an aortic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 cm, 196 (5.6%) between 2.6 and 3.0 cm, and 171 (4.9%) had aortic diameters greater than 3 cm--29 of whom had AAA greater than 5 cm with a mean diameter of 6.0 cm (range 5.1-9.0 cm). Of 127 men with an initial diameter of 3.1-4.0 cm (mean progression in size of 2.3 mm/year), 22 enlarged to > 4 cm and 3 to > 5 cm. Of 24 men with an initial diameter of 4.1-5.0 cm, 6 enlarged to > 5 cm. Some 69 (2%) patients were referred to hospital requiring a total of 125 consultations (1.8 consultations per patient); 21 underwent surgery and one died from rupture whilst awaiting surgery. Five patients refused their operation and two failed to attend the clinic (all > 5 cm) but remain well to date. No patient died following surgery. We conclude that, screening for AAA in men at age 65 years within an urban setting is feasible and well received by patients and GPs. Screening does not lead to a huge increase in terms of outpatient appointments and operations for AAA.
Aged, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, England, Family Practice/organization & administration, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening/methods, Program Evaluation, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Urban Health Services/organization & administration, Workload
  
  59-63
  
    
      Kyriakides, C
      
        6e61d671-1e98-404f-868d-af61e10f28f5
      
     
  
    
      Byrne, James
      
        e3d5b8fe-1b69-441c-a173-e084fe5372a6
      
     
  
    
      Green, S
      
        1dc7c80b-8a37-49c9-94d6-1f8546f1316f
      
     
  
    
      Hulton, N R
      
        7a1daf05-b460-42a5-adc3-1c2118c4729d
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      January 2000
    
    
  
  
    
      Kyriakides, C
      
        6e61d671-1e98-404f-868d-af61e10f28f5
      
     
  
    
      Byrne, James
      
        e3d5b8fe-1b69-441c-a173-e084fe5372a6
      
     
  
    
      Green, S
      
        1dc7c80b-8a37-49c9-94d6-1f8546f1316f
      
     
  
    
      Hulton, N R
      
        7a1daf05-b460-42a5-adc3-1c2118c4729d
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Kyriakides, C, Byrne, James, Green, S and Hulton, N R
  
  
  
  
   
    (2000)
  
  
    
    Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach.
  
  
  
  
    Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82 (1), .
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
      
        
          Abstract
          In order to evaluate the feasibility of a selective screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) within an urban setting and assess its impact on the expected increase in workload for the local hospital(s), a population based, prospective study was performed. A total of 4823 men aged 65 years were invited for ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta between January 1993 and April 1997 as part of a general practice-based aneurysm screening programme covering two districts with a general hospital each. All examinations were carried out by senior radiographers using a portable B mode grey scale machine and a 3.5 MHz curvi-linear array probe. Patients with a maximum aortic diameter of over 3 cm were annually recalled, those with over 4 cm were referred to hospital for an out-patient's appointment. Those with AAA greater than 5 cm were considered for surgery. Of those approached, 3497 (72.5%) took part in the study, 1206 (25%) did not attend and 120 (2.5%) were excluded by their general practitioners (GPs) on medical grounds. Of the men taking part, 3130 (89.5%) had an aortic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 cm, 196 (5.6%) between 2.6 and 3.0 cm, and 171 (4.9%) had aortic diameters greater than 3 cm--29 of whom had AAA greater than 5 cm with a mean diameter of 6.0 cm (range 5.1-9.0 cm). Of 127 men with an initial diameter of 3.1-4.0 cm (mean progression in size of 2.3 mm/year), 22 enlarged to > 4 cm and 3 to > 5 cm. Of 24 men with an initial diameter of 4.1-5.0 cm, 6 enlarged to > 5 cm. Some 69 (2%) patients were referred to hospital requiring a total of 125 consultations (1.8 consultations per patient); 21 underwent surgery and one died from rupture whilst awaiting surgery. Five patients refused their operation and two failed to attend the clinic (all > 5 cm) but remain well to date. No patient died following surgery. We conclude that, screening for AAA in men at age 65 years within an urban setting is feasible and well received by patients and GPs. Screening does not lead to a huge increase in terms of outpatient appointments and operations for AAA.
        
        This record has no associated files available for download.
       
    
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: January 2000
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
    
  
    
     
        Keywords:
        Aged, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, England, Family Practice/organization & administration, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening/methods, Program Evaluation, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Urban Health Services/organization & administration, Workload
      
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 473392
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473392
        
        
        
          ISSN: 0035-8843
        
        
          PURE UUID: a966d4ee-661b-4521-bc14-feab504bf866
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 17 Jan 2023 17:39
  Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 00:13
  Export record
  
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              C Kyriakides
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                James Byrne
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              S Green
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              N R Hulton
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics