The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach

Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach
Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach

In order to evaluate the feasibility of a selective screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) within an urban setting and assess its impact on the expected increase in workload for the local hospital(s), a population based, prospective study was performed. A total of 4823 men aged 65 years were invited for ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta between January 1993 and April 1997 as part of a general practice-based aneurysm screening programme covering two districts with a general hospital each. All examinations were carried out by senior radiographers using a portable B mode grey scale machine and a 3.5 MHz curvi-linear array probe. Patients with a maximum aortic diameter of over 3 cm were annually recalled, those with over 4 cm were referred to hospital for an out-patient's appointment. Those with AAA greater than 5 cm were considered for surgery. Of those approached, 3497 (72.5%) took part in the study, 1206 (25%) did not attend and 120 (2.5%) were excluded by their general practitioners (GPs) on medical grounds. Of the men taking part, 3130 (89.5%) had an aortic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 cm, 196 (5.6%) between 2.6 and 3.0 cm, and 171 (4.9%) had aortic diameters greater than 3 cm--29 of whom had AAA greater than 5 cm with a mean diameter of 6.0 cm (range 5.1-9.0 cm). Of 127 men with an initial diameter of 3.1-4.0 cm (mean progression in size of 2.3 mm/year), 22 enlarged to > 4 cm and 3 to > 5 cm. Of 24 men with an initial diameter of 4.1-5.0 cm, 6 enlarged to > 5 cm. Some 69 (2%) patients were referred to hospital requiring a total of 125 consultations (1.8 consultations per patient); 21 underwent surgery and one died from rupture whilst awaiting surgery. Five patients refused their operation and two failed to attend the clinic (all > 5 cm) but remain well to date. No patient died following surgery. We conclude that, screening for AAA in men at age 65 years within an urban setting is feasible and well received by patients and GPs. Screening does not lead to a huge increase in terms of outpatient appointments and operations for AAA.

Aged, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, England, Family Practice/organization & administration, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening/methods, Program Evaluation, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Urban Health Services/organization & administration, Workload
0035-8843
59-63
Kyriakides, C
6e61d671-1e98-404f-868d-af61e10f28f5
Byrne, James
e3d5b8fe-1b69-441c-a173-e084fe5372a6
Green, S
1dc7c80b-8a37-49c9-94d6-1f8546f1316f
Hulton, N R
7a1daf05-b460-42a5-adc3-1c2118c4729d
Kyriakides, C
6e61d671-1e98-404f-868d-af61e10f28f5
Byrne, James
e3d5b8fe-1b69-441c-a173-e084fe5372a6
Green, S
1dc7c80b-8a37-49c9-94d6-1f8546f1316f
Hulton, N R
7a1daf05-b460-42a5-adc3-1c2118c4729d

Kyriakides, C, Byrne, James, Green, S and Hulton, N R (2000) Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82 (1), 59-63.

Record type: Article

Abstract

In order to evaluate the feasibility of a selective screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) within an urban setting and assess its impact on the expected increase in workload for the local hospital(s), a population based, prospective study was performed. A total of 4823 men aged 65 years were invited for ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta between January 1993 and April 1997 as part of a general practice-based aneurysm screening programme covering two districts with a general hospital each. All examinations were carried out by senior radiographers using a portable B mode grey scale machine and a 3.5 MHz curvi-linear array probe. Patients with a maximum aortic diameter of over 3 cm were annually recalled, those with over 4 cm were referred to hospital for an out-patient's appointment. Those with AAA greater than 5 cm were considered for surgery. Of those approached, 3497 (72.5%) took part in the study, 1206 (25%) did not attend and 120 (2.5%) were excluded by their general practitioners (GPs) on medical grounds. Of the men taking part, 3130 (89.5%) had an aortic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 cm, 196 (5.6%) between 2.6 and 3.0 cm, and 171 (4.9%) had aortic diameters greater than 3 cm--29 of whom had AAA greater than 5 cm with a mean diameter of 6.0 cm (range 5.1-9.0 cm). Of 127 men with an initial diameter of 3.1-4.0 cm (mean progression in size of 2.3 mm/year), 22 enlarged to > 4 cm and 3 to > 5 cm. Of 24 men with an initial diameter of 4.1-5.0 cm, 6 enlarged to > 5 cm. Some 69 (2%) patients were referred to hospital requiring a total of 125 consultations (1.8 consultations per patient); 21 underwent surgery and one died from rupture whilst awaiting surgery. Five patients refused their operation and two failed to attend the clinic (all > 5 cm) but remain well to date. No patient died following surgery. We conclude that, screening for AAA in men at age 65 years within an urban setting is feasible and well received by patients and GPs. Screening does not lead to a huge increase in terms of outpatient appointments and operations for AAA.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2000
Keywords: Aged, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, England, Family Practice/organization & administration, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening/methods, Program Evaluation, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Urban Health Services/organization & administration, Workload

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473392
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473392
ISSN: 0035-8843
PURE UUID: a966d4ee-661b-4521-bc14-feab504bf866

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2023 17:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 00:13

Export record

Contributors

Author: C Kyriakides
Author: James Byrne
Author: S Green
Author: N R Hulton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×