Reflecting on God's will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples' deontological dilemma responses
Reflecting on God's will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples' deontological dilemma responses
Religious people tend to reject harm on moral dilemmas where causing harm maximizes outcomes, which is consistent with deontological but not utilitarian philosophy. Past research suggests that non-reflective processes drive deontological judgments, such as affective reactions to harm or heuristic application of moral rules. Yet, for religious people, reflective processes may also play a role in driving deontological judgments. We examined this possibility in three studies. Unlike most research, which treats deontological and utilitarian responses as diametric opposites, we employed process dissociation to assess them independently. Religiosity was associated with increased deontological and reduced utilitarian response tendencies—but time pressure (Study 1) and cognitive load (Study 2) reduced deontological tendencies among religious people. Increasing the salience of religious values attenuated this effect, without impacting utilitarian tendencies or the responses of less-religious people (Study 3). Thus, reflective consideration of religious values may contribute to deontological response tendencies among religious people.
301-314
McPhetres, Jonathon
0a17bf2b-8f12-44cb-9089-5cbdf48457e3
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Hughes, Jamie S.
210df727-f5e6-4b70-b1c7-3ec09de78778
Zuckerman, Miron
760418ef-afca-41d5-8b8d-59b33615f1a6
1 November 2018
McPhetres, Jonathon
0a17bf2b-8f12-44cb-9089-5cbdf48457e3
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Hughes, Jamie S.
210df727-f5e6-4b70-b1c7-3ec09de78778
Zuckerman, Miron
760418ef-afca-41d5-8b8d-59b33615f1a6
McPhetres, Jonathon, Conway, Paul, Hughes, Jamie S. and Zuckerman, Miron
(2018)
Reflecting on God's will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples' deontological dilemma responses.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, .
(doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.013).
Abstract
Religious people tend to reject harm on moral dilemmas where causing harm maximizes outcomes, which is consistent with deontological but not utilitarian philosophy. Past research suggests that non-reflective processes drive deontological judgments, such as affective reactions to harm or heuristic application of moral rules. Yet, for religious people, reflective processes may also play a role in driving deontological judgments. We examined this possibility in three studies. Unlike most research, which treats deontological and utilitarian responses as diametric opposites, we employed process dissociation to assess them independently. Religiosity was associated with increased deontological and reduced utilitarian response tendencies—but time pressure (Study 1) and cognitive load (Study 2) reduced deontological tendencies among religious people. Increasing the salience of religious values attenuated this effect, without impacting utilitarian tendencies or the responses of less-religious people (Study 3). Thus, reflective consideration of religious values may contribute to deontological response tendencies among religious people.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 24 August 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 September 2018
Published date: 1 November 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 473514
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473514
ISSN: 0022-1031
PURE UUID: 3e96fc15-2786-4050-9c71-fe7509f4a5a0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2023 18:06
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jonathon McPhetres
Author:
Paul Conway
Author:
Jamie S. Hughes
Author:
Miron Zuckerman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics