The strategic moral self: self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments
The strategic moral self: self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments
Research has focused on the cognitive and affective processes underpinning dilemma judgments where causing harm maximizes outcomes. Yet, recent work indicates that lay perceivers infer the processes behind others' judgments, raising two new questions: whether decision-makers accurately anticipate the inferences perceivers draw from their judgments (i.e., meta-insight), and, whether decision-makers strategically modify judgments to present themselves favorably. Across seven studies, a) people correctly anticipated how their dilemma judgments would influence perceivers' ratings of their warmth and competence, though self-ratings differed (Studies 1–3), b) people strategically shifted public (but not private) dilemma judgments to present themselves as warm or competent depending on which traits the situation favored (Studies 4–6), and, c) self-presentation strategies augmented perceptions of the weaker trait implied by their judgment (Study 7). These results suggest that moral dilemma judgments arise out of more than just basic cognitive and affective processes; complex social considerations causally contribute to dilemma decision-making.
24-37
Rom, Sarah C.
4fc106dd-4702-45db-a639-b1cc418e1357
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
1 January 2018
Rom, Sarah C.
4fc106dd-4702-45db-a639-b1cc418e1357
Conway, Paul
765aaaf9-173f-44cf-be9a-c8ffbb51e286
Rom, Sarah C. and Conway, Paul
(2018)
The strategic moral self: self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, .
(doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.003).
Abstract
Research has focused on the cognitive and affective processes underpinning dilemma judgments where causing harm maximizes outcomes. Yet, recent work indicates that lay perceivers infer the processes behind others' judgments, raising two new questions: whether decision-makers accurately anticipate the inferences perceivers draw from their judgments (i.e., meta-insight), and, whether decision-makers strategically modify judgments to present themselves favorably. Across seven studies, a) people correctly anticipated how their dilemma judgments would influence perceivers' ratings of their warmth and competence, though self-ratings differed (Studies 1–3), b) people strategically shifted public (but not private) dilemma judgments to present themselves as warm or competent depending on which traits the situation favored (Studies 4–6), and, c) self-presentation strategies augmented perceptions of the weaker trait implied by their judgment (Study 7). These results suggest that moral dilemma judgments arise out of more than just basic cognitive and affective processes; complex social considerations causally contribute to dilemma decision-making.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 August 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 August 2017
Published date: 1 January 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 473521
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473521
ISSN: 0022-1031
PURE UUID: fb420377-0274-4c9c-92ce-ea1e22aa3320
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2023 18:06
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sarah C. Rom
Author:
Paul Conway
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics