The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy in patients who have had a previous breast augmentation: lessons from the national multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study

Implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy in patients who have had a previous breast augmentation: lessons from the national multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study
Implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy in patients who have had a previous breast augmentation: lessons from the national multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study

Background: breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic procedure, and increasingly women in this group present with breast cancer or request risk-reducing surgery, but their optimal management is unclear. The authors explored the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following previous augmentation and compared these with outcomes of patients who had not had cosmetic implants in the Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation (iBRA) Study. 

Methods: patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were prospectively recruited from breast and plastic surgical units across the United Kingdom. Demographic, operative, and oncologic data, and information regarding complications within 3 postoperative months were collected. Patient-reported outcomes at 18 months were assessed using the BREAST-Q. The clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without previous breast augmentation were compared. 

Results: a total of 2108 women were included in the iBRA Study, of whom 49 had undergone a previous augmentation. Women in the augmentation group were younger (median age, 45 years versus 50 years; p = 0.01), had a lower body mass index (22.8 kg/m 2 versus 24.9 kg/m 2; p < 0.01), and had smaller tumors (15 mm versus 25 mm; p = 0.01) than patients without augmentation. No differences were seen in operative technique between the groups. Complications at 3 months were similar in both groups and there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at 18 months. 

Conclusions: the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following previous augmentation are consistent with those observed in the wider iBRA Study cohort, supporting the safety of this approach.

Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Implantation, Breast Neoplasms/surgery, Female, Humans, Mammaplasty, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom, Young Adult
0032-1052
324-337
Baker, Benjamin G.
6b5b32e0-45db-4fd2-8b4e-0e7d14a57e14
Sewart, Emma
518b9302-59b2-4045-bcf0-f4fb9b904590
Harvey, James
7513f13d-d544-4763-8bb5-caf588be01b6
Potter, Shelley
846066f0-1336-45e1-828b-dfdedfc5c1be
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study Steering Group and Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative
Baker, Benjamin G.
6b5b32e0-45db-4fd2-8b4e-0e7d14a57e14
Sewart, Emma
518b9302-59b2-4045-bcf0-f4fb9b904590
Harvey, James
7513f13d-d544-4763-8bb5-caf588be01b6
Potter, Shelley
846066f0-1336-45e1-828b-dfdedfc5c1be
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406

Baker, Benjamin G., Sewart, Emma, Harvey, James and Cutress, Ramsey , Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study Steering Group and Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative (2022) Implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy in patients who have had a previous breast augmentation: lessons from the national multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 149 (2), 324-337. (doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008713).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic procedure, and increasingly women in this group present with breast cancer or request risk-reducing surgery, but their optimal management is unclear. The authors explored the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following previous augmentation and compared these with outcomes of patients who had not had cosmetic implants in the Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation (iBRA) Study. 

Methods: patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were prospectively recruited from breast and plastic surgical units across the United Kingdom. Demographic, operative, and oncologic data, and information regarding complications within 3 postoperative months were collected. Patient-reported outcomes at 18 months were assessed using the BREAST-Q. The clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without previous breast augmentation were compared. 

Results: a total of 2108 women were included in the iBRA Study, of whom 49 had undergone a previous augmentation. Women in the augmentation group were younger (median age, 45 years versus 50 years; p = 0.01), had a lower body mass index (22.8 kg/m 2 versus 24.9 kg/m 2; p < 0.01), and had smaller tumors (15 mm versus 25 mm; p = 0.01) than patients without augmentation. No differences were seen in operative technique between the groups. Complications at 3 months were similar in both groups and there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at 18 months. 

Conclusions: the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following previous augmentation are consistent with those observed in the wider iBRA Study cohort, supporting the safety of this approach.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 February 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was funded by a National Institute for Health Research, Research for Patient Benefit Programme grant (PB-PG-0214-33065); pump-priming funding from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons; and a Research Development Award from the Association of Breast Surgery (2019). Shelley Potter, Ph.D., F.H.E.A., F.R.C.S., N.I.H.R., is a National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist (CS-2016-16-019). This work was undertaken with the support of the Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II (Collaboration and innovation for Difficult and Complex randomized controlled Trials In Invasive procedures) Hub for Trials Methodology Research (MR/K025643/1) and the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Keywords: Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Implantation, Breast Neoplasms/surgery, Female, Humans, Mammaplasty, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom, Young Adult

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473587
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473587
ISSN: 0032-1052
PURE UUID: 24ebd056-dca0-4f23-a632-646ff3a9cc36

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jan 2023 17:36
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 23:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Benjamin G. Baker
Author: Emma Sewart
Author: James Harvey
Author: Shelley Potter
Author: Ramsey Cutress
Corporate Author: Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study Steering Group and Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×