The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of rapid molecular testing methods for detecting respiratory viruses in emergency care: a prospective study

Comparison of rapid molecular testing methods for detecting respiratory viruses in emergency care: a prospective study
Comparison of rapid molecular testing methods for detecting respiratory viruses in emergency care: a prospective study
Background: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) caused by contagious viruses are common among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Early detection of these viruses can help prevent nosocomial transmission.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of three rapid molecular methods, namely FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (FAP plus), ID NOW™ Influenza A and B 2 (ID NOW2) point-of-care test, and an in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, to identify patients with viral RTIs requiring isolation in an emergency setting.

Methods: We included a FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus in the initial workup of patients with suspected RTIs during a flu season. The RT-PCR and the influenza point-of-care test were performed as part of routine diagnostics, on demand from the treating physicians. We compared viral detections and compared time to positive test results for each method.

Findings: The FAP plus significantly reduced the turnaround time and was able to identify 95% patients with potential contagious viral RTI. Routine diagnostics ordered by the treating physician had a turnaround time of a median 22 h and detected 87% of patients with potential contagious viral RTI. In patients that had all three tests, the ID NOW2 detected 62% of patients with influenza.

Conclusions: The FAP plus was able to rapidly and reliably identify patients with potential contagious viral RTIs; its use was feasible in the ED setting. Failing to test patients with viral RTI and using tests with long turnaround time may lead to nosocomial transmission of viral infections and adverse patient outcomes.
2374-4235
247
Clark, Tristan
712ec18e-613c-45df-a013-c8a22834e14f
Markussen, Dagfinn
9952f0d0-a513-4057-a5df-c2a4a8b63e82
Grewal, Harleen
96296a44-2983-4ea5-9736-3fd6e5f07c1d
Knoop, Siri T
4d48f7fc-f123-47e0-aa88-09f81b70e75d
Serigstad, Sondre
2cb79a07-f97a-46c1-a748-69ad7e9efcc6
Kommedal, Oyvind
263d4356-09e5-4c9d-9045-6ff5b90ee1ec
Ebbeseb, Marit
9bd20d42-6216-4909-b59f-b0cad3fe6fc9
Ulvestad, Elling
0760ea00-af53-48cc-9180-ac98ed4848ac
Bjørneklett, Rune O.
0787477f-06e8-4a14-9a77-ddb8842d323d
CAPNOR study group, CAPNOR study group
3a8146a0-ad13-4e58-aca0-57858433033e
Clark, Tristan
712ec18e-613c-45df-a013-c8a22834e14f
Markussen, Dagfinn
9952f0d0-a513-4057-a5df-c2a4a8b63e82
Grewal, Harleen
96296a44-2983-4ea5-9736-3fd6e5f07c1d
Knoop, Siri T
4d48f7fc-f123-47e0-aa88-09f81b70e75d
Serigstad, Sondre
2cb79a07-f97a-46c1-a748-69ad7e9efcc6
Kommedal, Oyvind
263d4356-09e5-4c9d-9045-6ff5b90ee1ec
Ebbeseb, Marit
9bd20d42-6216-4909-b59f-b0cad3fe6fc9
Ulvestad, Elling
0760ea00-af53-48cc-9180-ac98ed4848ac
Bjørneklett, Rune O.
0787477f-06e8-4a14-9a77-ddb8842d323d
CAPNOR study group, CAPNOR study group
3a8146a0-ad13-4e58-aca0-57858433033e

Clark, Tristan, Markussen, Dagfinn, Grewal, Harleen, Knoop, Siri T, Serigstad, Sondre, Kommedal, Oyvind, Ebbeseb, Marit, Ulvestad, Elling, Bjørneklett, Rune O. and CAPNOR study group, CAPNOR study group (2021) Comparison of rapid molecular testing methods for detecting respiratory viruses in emergency care: a prospective study. Infectious Diseases, 54 (4), 247, [7]. (doi:10.1080/23744235.2021.2003857).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) caused by contagious viruses are common among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Early detection of these viruses can help prevent nosocomial transmission.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of three rapid molecular methods, namely FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (FAP plus), ID NOW™ Influenza A and B 2 (ID NOW2) point-of-care test, and an in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, to identify patients with viral RTIs requiring isolation in an emergency setting.

Methods: We included a FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus in the initial workup of patients with suspected RTIs during a flu season. The RT-PCR and the influenza point-of-care test were performed as part of routine diagnostics, on demand from the treating physicians. We compared viral detections and compared time to positive test results for each method.

Findings: The FAP plus significantly reduced the turnaround time and was able to identify 95% patients with potential contagious viral RTI. Routine diagnostics ordered by the treating physician had a turnaround time of a median 22 h and detected 87% of patients with potential contagious viral RTI. In patients that had all three tests, the ID NOW2 detected 62% of patients with influenza.

Conclusions: The FAP plus was able to rapidly and reliably identify patients with potential contagious viral RTIs; its use was feasible in the ED setting. Failing to test patients with viral RTI and using tests with long turnaround time may lead to nosocomial transmission of viral infections and adverse patient outcomes.

Text
Infect Dis CAPNOR paper 2 2022 - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 November 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 November 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473650
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473650
ISSN: 2374-4235
PURE UUID: 6f95cafd-c265-4f6e-a4d0-acb924b44dc5
ORCID for Tristan Clark: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-5295

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jan 2023 17:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tristan Clark ORCID iD
Author: Dagfinn Markussen
Author: Harleen Grewal
Author: Siri T Knoop
Author: Sondre Serigstad
Author: Oyvind Kommedal
Author: Marit Ebbeseb
Author: Elling Ulvestad
Author: Rune O. Bjørneklett
Author: CAPNOR study group CAPNOR study group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×