The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Why strike ballots are undemocratic

Why strike ballots are undemocratic
Why strike ballots are undemocratic
Since 2016, new legislation governing strike ballots has made it more difficult for trade unions to achieve a mandate for industrial action. Such a mandate now requires that a majority of members vote in the ballot. This article argues that these balloting processes are undemocratic. The turnout requirement means that a mandate for industrial action does not simply depend on its level of popular support amongst union members. This has surprising consequences. Sometimes opponents of action would be better advised to abstain, rather than to vote against it. Thus, it is not always clear how they should vote. Whatever they do, their actions may be counterproductive. Further, even when they do know how best to promote their desired outcome, there may be a conflict between voting strategically and clearly expressing their true preferences. Consequently, there is no guarantee that the outcome of the ballot accurately reflects what people really want.
0032-3179
620-627
Saunders, Ben
aed7ba9f-f519-4bbf-a554-db25b684037d
Saunders, Ben
aed7ba9f-f519-4bbf-a554-db25b684037d

Saunders, Ben (2022) Why strike ballots are undemocratic. The Political Quarterly, 93 (4), 620-627.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Since 2016, new legislation governing strike ballots has made it more difficult for trade unions to achieve a mandate for industrial action. Such a mandate now requires that a majority of members vote in the ballot. This article argues that these balloting processes are undemocratic. The turnout requirement means that a mandate for industrial action does not simply depend on its level of popular support amongst union members. This has surprising consequences. Sometimes opponents of action would be better advised to abstain, rather than to vote against it. Thus, it is not always clear how they should vote. Whatever they do, their actions may be counterproductive. Further, even when they do know how best to promote their desired outcome, there may be a conflict between voting strategically and clearly expressing their true preferences. Consequently, there is no guarantee that the outcome of the ballot accurately reflects what people really want.

Text
PQ final style - strike ballots - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (32kB)
Text
Political Quarterly - 2022 - Saunders - Why Strike Ballots are Undemocratic - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (82kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 November 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 November 2022
Published date: 12 December 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473722
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473722
ISSN: 0032-3179
PURE UUID: 17776db0-ea4a-44ad-b522-8610db7007bf
ORCID for Ben Saunders: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-6397

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jan 2023 19:15
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:36

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×